Abstract
The aim of the study executed with the perpendicular strip method with three replications, conducted at the Experimental Department of Variety Evaluation in Krościna Mała in the years 2010–2012, was to determine how varieties of oat seeds would respond to the recommended and half of the recommended dose of herbicides for weed reduction, the size of grain yields, its structure and grain quality. Two varieties of oat were tested: Arden and Haker, which were sprayed during tillering with following herbicides: Starane 250 EC at doses of 0.4 and 0.8 l/ha and Chwastox Turbo 340 SL at doses of 1.0 and 2.0 l/ha. The listed herbicides, regardless of the dose, had a positive effect on the reduction of weed infestation, resulting in the increase of grain yield in relation to the controlled objects where no herbicides were used. The analysis of the structure of crops has shown that grain yields on combinations protected by herbicides resulted from increased stocking panicles per unit area, while the 1,000 grain weight and the number of grains per panicle followed a similar pattern as in the control plots. Herbicides used in the cultivation of oat increased the total protein content in grain and the share of grain yield with a diameter above 2.5 mm. Celem doświadczeń, które założono metodą pasów prostopadłych w 3 powtórzeniach, w Zakładzie Doświadczalnym Oceny Odmian w Krościnie Małej, w latach 2010–2012, była ocena wpływu pełnych i ograniczonych o połowę dawek wybranych herbicydów na redukcję zachwaszczenia oraz wysokość plonu, jego strukturę i cechy jakościowe ziarna dwóch odmian owsa. Badano różniące się pod względem morfologicznym, dwie odmiany owsa: Arden i Haker, które w fazie krzewienia opryskiwano herbicydami: Starane 250 EC w dawkach 0,4 i 0,8 l/ha oraz Chwastox Turbo 340 SL w dawkach 1,0 i 2,0 l/ha. Wymienione herbicydy, niezależnie od zastosowanej dawki, miały korzystny wpływ na redukcję zachwaszczenia, co skutkowało przyrostem plonów ziarna w stosunku do obiektów kontrolnych, nieopryskiwanych środkami chwastobójczymi. Analiza plonów dowiodła, że plony ziarna na kombinacjach chronionych herbicydami wynikały ze zwiększonej obsady wiech na jednostce powierzchni, natomiast masa 1000 ziaren i liczba ziaren w wiechach kształtowała się podobnie, jak na poletkach kontrolnych. Zastosowane w uprawie owsa herbicydy wpłynęły na zwiększenie zawartości białka ogólnego w ziarnie oraz zwiększenie udziału ziarna w plonie o średnicy powyżej 2,5 mm.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Both listed herbicides reduced weed infestation regardless of dose.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- listed herbicidese0
- Outcome
- weed infestatione0
- Direction
- reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The listed herbicides, regardless of the dose, had a positive effect on the reduction of weed infestation”
t0“The effect of different doses of herbicides on the yield and grain quality of two varieties of oats”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide-protected oats had higher grain yield than untreated controls.
- Taxon
- oatsAvena sativat0
- Treatment
- herbicidese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Comparator
- controlled objects where no herbicides were usede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The listed herbicides, regardless of the dose, had a positive effect on the reduction of weed infestation, resulting in the increase of grain yield in relation to the controlled objects where no herbicides were used.”
t0“The effect of different doses of herbicides on the yield and grain quality of two varieties of oats”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicide-protected oat plots had more panicles per unit area.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“grain yields on combinations protected by herbicides resulted from increased stocking panicles per unit area”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat 1,000 grain weight was similar to control plots under herbicides.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the 1,000 grain weight and the number of grains per panicle followed a similar pattern as in the control plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Oat grains per panicle were similar to control plots under herbicides.
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“the 1,000 grain weight and the number of grains per panicle followed a similar pattern as in the control plots.”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides increased oat grain total protein content.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- Herbicidese0
- Outcome
- total protein content in graine0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Herbicides used in the cultivation of oat increased the total protein content in grain”
Claim · model-written summary
Herbicides increased the share of oat grain larger than 2.5 mm.
- Taxon
- oatAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- Herbicidese0
- Outcome
- share of grain yield with a diameter above 2.5 mme0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Herbicides used in the cultivation of oat increased the total protein content in grain and the share of grain yield with a diameter above 2.5 mm.”
The same questions in other papers
herbicide · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →herbicide · weed · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
12 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.