Abstract
The aims of this study were to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan. Results showed that grain yield, number of grain pe r cob, 1000 grain weight and plant height were maximum at deep tillage as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage. Total input energy was maximum in combined application with NPK + FYM fertilizer as compared to FYM, NPK fertilizer alone and low in control where no fertilizer was applied. The output energy was gained in deep tillage where combined NPK + FYM were applied and lowest energy was gained in control plots. The results showed that combined NPK + FYM fertilizer level gave highest grain yi eld in deep tillage against conventional tillage and low grain yield was recorded in zero tillage. Although deep tillage consumed more energy as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage gave maximum grain yield, grain number per cob and 1000 grain weight compared with conventional tillage
- Treatment
- deep tillagee2
- Outcome
- grain yield, number of grain pe r cob, 1000 grain weighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Qualifier
- lowest in zero tillagee2
- Comparator
- conventionale2
- Setting
- Islamabad, Pakistane1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e2“grain yield, number of grain pe r cob, 1000 grain weight and plant height were maximum at deep tillage as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage gave maximum plant height compared with conventional tillage
- Treatment
- deep tillagee2
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Qualifier
- lowest in zero tillagee2
- Comparator
- conventionale2
- Setting
- Islamabad, Pakistane1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e2“grain yield, number of grain pe r cob, 1000 grain weight and plant height were maximum at deep tillage as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined NPK + FYM fertilizer gave the highest grain yield in deep tillage compared with conventional tillage
- Treatment
- combined NPK + FYM fertilizer levele3
- Outcome
- grain yi elde3
- Direction
- higheste3
- Qualifier
- low grain yield was recorded in zero tillagee3
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee3
- Setting
- Islamabad, Pakistane1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e3“combined NPK + FYM fertilizer level gave highest grain yi eld in deep tillage against conventional tillage and low grain yield was recorded in zero tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Total input energy was maximum with combined NPK + FYM fertilizer compared with FYM or NPK alone
- Treatment
- combined application with NPK + FYM fertilizere4
- Outcome
- Total input energye4
- Direction
- maximume4
- Comparator
- FYM, NPK fertilizer alonee4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e4“Total input energy was maximum in combined application with NPK + FYM fertilizer as compared to FYM, NPK fertilizer alone and low in control where no fertilizer was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Total input energy was lowest in the control without fertilizer
- Treatment
- no fertilizer was appliede4
- Outcome
- Total input energye4
- Direction
- lowe4
- Comparator
- combined application with NPK + FYM fertilizere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e4“Total input energy was maximum in combined application with NPK + FYM fertilizer as compared to FYM, NPK fertilizer alone and low in control where no fertilizer was applied”
Claim · model-written summary
Output energy was higher with combined NPK + FYM in deep tillage than in the control
- Treatment
- combined NPK + FYMe5
- Outcome
- output energye5
- Direction
- higherinferrede5
- Comparator
- controle5
- Setting
- Islamabad, Pakistane1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e5“The output energy was gained in deep tillage where combined NPK + FYM were applied and lowest energy was gained in control plots”
Claim · model-written summary
Deep tillage consumed more energy than conventional tillage
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e6“Although deep tillage consumed more energy as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Zero tillage gave the lowest energy use
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“to determine the input and outputs energy for maize production in Islamabad, Pakistan”
e6“Although deep tillage consumed more energy as compared to conventional and lowest in zero tillage”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 81 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
279 papers more in this group
See all 283 papers →tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- negative
- no effect
3,904 papers more in this group
See all 3,908 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.