Paper · 1984 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effect of spacing on growth and yield of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) under two systems of dry farming in Sudan

F. M. Khalifa

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary An experiment was conducted over a 2-year period at two sites in the central rainlands of Sudan under rainfed conditions at one location and under supplementary irrigation at the other to investigate the effects of cultivars and spacing on yield and yield components of sunflower. Row spacing had no significant effect on grain yield under either system of production. Under rainfed conditions, the late maturing cultivar Manchurian performed better under wider row spacing than Hungarian-A which is a medium late maturing variety. Size and number of seeds weie significantly affected by row width. It is argued that the choice of a row spacing for sunflower production on a commercial scale in dry regions should be evaluated in association with machine efficiency which is affected by plant height, stem circumference, head diameter and lodging, all of which were significantly affected by row width. Also the number of plants established per unit area of land differed between systems of farming.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Row spacing had no significant effect on sunflower grain yield in either system.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Row spacinge0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Row spacing had no significant effect on grain yield under either system of production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 289–376 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under rainfed conditions, Manchurian performed better at wider spacing than Hungarian-A.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Material
Manchuriane0
Treatment
wider row spacinge0
Outcome
performed bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
Hungarian-Ae0
Setting
rainfed conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under rainfed conditions, the late maturing cultivar Manchurian performed better under wider row spacing than Hungarian-A”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 377–498 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed size was significantly affected by row width.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
row widthe0
Outcome
Sizee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Size and number of seeds weie significantly affected by row width.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed number was significantly affected by row width.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
row widthe0
Outcome
number of seedse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Size and number of seeds weie significantly affected by row width.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–606 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height, stem circumference and head diameter were significantly affected by row width.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
row widthe0
Outcome
plant height, stem circumference, head diametere0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, stem circumference, head diameter and lodging, all of which were significantly affected by row width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging was significantly affected by row width.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
row widthe0
Outcome
lodginge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height, stem circumference, head diameter and lodging, all of which were significantly affected by row width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Established plants per unit area differed between farming systems.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Outcome
number of plants established per unit area of lande0
Direction
differede0
Comparator
systems of farminge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of plants established per unit area of land differed between systems of farming.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–1007 · show in text ↑
t0

“sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–50 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Commercial sunflower row spacing in dry regions should be evaluated alongside machine efficiency.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Outcome
choice of a row spacinge0
Qualifier
machine efficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the choice of a row spacing for sunflower production on a commercial scale in dry regions should be evaluated in association with machine efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 625–773 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

85 papers: 70 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 70 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

81 papers more in this group

See all 85 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.