Paper · 2003 · Journal of Economic Entomology

Transect Sampling to Enhance Efficiency of Corn Rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) Monitoring in Corn

John E. Losey; Leslie L. Allee; Vladimir Zbarsky; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.). Improvements in sampling methodology, including the development of a sequential sampling plan, have reduced the minimum sampling time required to make a management decision to 20 min or less per field per visit. However, many growers and crop consultants still find this time commitment a constraint to repeated scouting. A common currently used sampling method involves systematically covering most of the field following a "W" pattern. The feasibility of replacing the current sampling pattern with a simpler and less time-consuming transect (straight line) pattern was assessed. When sampling methods were compared, computer simulations demonstrated that treatment decisions based on transect sampling would have an acceptably low error rate averaging 10% over a range of realistic corn rootworm densities (0-2 adults per plant). This error rate represented a decrease in accuracy of <1% compared with systematic sampling. Field trials using transect, systematic, and random sampling in each field were used to compare the categorization of adult corn rootworm densities into "above" or "below" threshold with a sequential sampling plan. Efficiency measured in time to reach a decision, number of corn plants evaluated, and time divided by plants observed were compared between sampling methods. The three methods did not differ significantly in the number of plants evaluated or in the categorization of corn rootworm populations. Transect sampling resulted in a significantly shorter time divided by plants observed (38 s), than either systematic (78 s), or random sampling methods (166 s). Based on these results transect sampling reduces sampling time 51% compared with systematic sampling and thus could be used to reduce total sampling times substantially.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

In simulations, transect-based treatment decisions had an average error rate of 10% across 0-2 adult corn rootworms per plant.

Treatment
transect samplinge1
Interactor
corn rootworme1pest
Outcome
error ratee1
Value
10%e1
Qualifier
0-2 adults per plante1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e1

“When sampling methods were compared, computer simulations demonstrated that treatment decisions based on transect sampling would have an acceptably low error rate averaging 10% over a range of realistic corn rootworm densities (0-2 adults per plant)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 806–1055 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultnegativesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Transect sampling decreased accuracy by less than 1% compared with systematic sampling.

Outcome
accuracye2
Direction
decreasee2
Value
<1%e2
Comparator
systematic samplinge2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e2

“This error rate represented a decrease in accuracy of <1% compared with systematic sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1148 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transect, systematic and random sampling did not differ significantly in plants evaluated or in rootworm population categorization.

Interactor
corn rootworme3pest
Outcome
number of plants evaluated or in the categorization of corn rootworm populationse3
Comparator
transect, systematic, and random samplinge4
Setting
Field trialse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e3

“The three methods did not differ significantly in the number of plants evaluated or in the categorization of corn rootworm populations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1523–1657 · show in text ↑
e4

“Field trials using transect, systematic, and random sampling in each field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1224 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transect sampling needed less time per plant observed than systematic sampling.

Outcome
time divided by plants observede5
Direction
shortere5
Value
38 se5
Qualifier
78 se5
Comparator
systematice5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e5

“Transect sampling resulted in a significantly shorter time divided by plants observed (38 s), than either systematic (78 s), or random sampling methods (166 s)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1818 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Transect sampling needed less time per plant observed than random sampling.

Outcome
time divided by plants observede5
Direction
shortere5
Value
38 se5
Qualifier
166 se5
Comparator
random sampling methodse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e5

“Transect sampling resulted in a significantly shorter time divided by plants observed (38 s), than either systematic (78 s), or random sampling methods (166 s)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1659–1818 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transect sampling reduced sampling time by 51% compared with systematic sampling.

Outcome
sampling timee6
Direction
reducese6
Value
51%e6
Comparator
systematic samplinge6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e6

“transect sampling reduces sampling time 51% compared with systematic sampling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1843–1920 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Transect sampling could be used to reduce total sampling times substantially.

Outcome
reduce total sampling timese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Crop monitoring for adult corn rootworms, Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte and Diabrotica barberi Smith and Lawrence, remains the best means to assess fields at risk from this pest if replanted to corn, Zea mays (L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–222 · show in text ↑
e7

“thus could be used to reduce total sampling times substantially”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1925–1988 · show in text ↑