Paper · 2011 · Weed Technology

Italian Ryegrass (Lolium perenne), Feral Cereal Rye (Secale cereale), and Volunteer Wheat (Triticum aestivum) Control in Winter Canola

J. Bushong; T. Peeper; M. Boyles; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Winter wheat is the predominant crop in Oklahoma, but winter annual grasses are becoming increasingly difficult to control. Summer crop rotations have not been generally adopted; it was decided, therefore, to use winter canola in a crop rotation. However, very little is known about how well herbicides used in canola production will control the winter annual grasses found in Oklahoma wheat fields. Thus, an experiment was conducted at three sites, and repeated the following year, to determine the efficacy of trifluralin, quizalofop, clethodim, and glyphosate in canola production. The weeds evaluated in the experiment were Italian ryegrass, feral cereal rye, and volunteer wheat, along with two varieties of canola: a glyphosate-resistant variety and a conventional variety. All herbicides effectively controlled volunteer wheat. Feral cereal rye and Italian ryegrass varied in response to the herbicide treatments. Trifluralin followed by (fb) quizalofop and glyphosate fb glyphosate were effective on all target species across locations. Effective control of grass weeds was obtained in both conventional and glyphosate-resistant winter canola. Most herbicide treatments improved canola yield over the nontreated check. This experiment demonstrates that Oklahoma wheat producers can effectively rotate to canola to use other herbicides for control of problematic grassy weeds.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All herbicides effectively controlled volunteer wheat in winter canola.

Treatment
herbicidese1
Interactor
volunteer wheate1weed
Outcome
controlled volunteer wheate1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e1

“All herbicides effectively controlled volunteer wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 780–833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Feral cereal rye and Italian ryegrass varied in response to the herbicide treatments.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse2
Interactor
Feral cereal ryee2weed
Second interactor
Italian ryegrassLolium multiflorume2weed
Outcome
varied in response to the herbicide treatmentse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · Second interactorKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e2

“Feral cereal rye and Italian ryegrass varied in response to the herbicide treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–919 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trifluralin followed by quizalofop was effective on all target species across locations.

Treatment
Trifluralin followed by (fb) quizalofope3
Outcome
effective on all target speciese3
Setting
across locationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Trifluralin followed by (fb) quizalofop and glyphosate fb glyphosate were effective on all target species across locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate followed by glyphosate was effective on all target species across locations.

Treatment
glyphosate fb glyphosatee3
Outcome
effective on all target speciese3
Setting
across locationse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e3

“Trifluralin followed by (fb) quizalofop and glyphosate fb glyphosate were effective on all target species across locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1043 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective control of grass weeds was obtained in both conventional and glyphosate-resistant winter canola.

Material
conventional and glyphosate-resistante4
Interactor
grass weedse4weed
Outcome
Effective control of grass weedse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e4

“Effective control of grass weeds was obtained in both conventional and glyphosate-resistant winter canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1045–1150 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most herbicide treatments improved canola yield over the nontreated check.

Treatment
herbicide treatmentse5
Outcome
canola yielde5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
nontreated checke5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e5

“Most herbicide treatments improved canola yield over the nontreated check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1152–1225 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Oklahoma wheat producers can rotate to canola to use other herbicides for control of problematic grassy weeds.

Outcome
rotate to canola to use other herbicides for control of problematic grassy weedse6
Setting
Oklahomae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Canola”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 121–134 · show in text ↑
e6

“This experiment demonstrates that Oklahoma wheat producers can effectively rotate to canola to use other herbicides for control of problematic grassy weeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1227–1382 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

51 papers: 32 positive, 19 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.