Paper · 2012 · American Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Impact of Grape Cluster Division on Cluster Morphology and Bunch Rot Epidemic

Daniel Molitor; Marc Behr; Lucien Hoffmann; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
66
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Manual horizontal cluster division may constitute an efficient tool to optimize wine composition. To test this hypothesis and to determine the optimal timing of this viticultural practice, the impact of cluster division on cluster morphology, bunch rot disease severity, and harvest parameters such as yield and total soluble solids was examined on the white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling in the Luxembourgish winegrowing region in 2010 and 2011. Treatments were applied at five different times between prebloom (BBCH 57) and veraison (BBCH 81). In both varieties, all postbloom cluster division treatments were able to loosen the cluster structure and reduce the bunch rot disease severity. The later cluster division took place, the more pronounced were the effects on cluster structure. The density index was a suitable measure of the cluster structure and the predisposition to bunch rot infestation. Cluster division resulted in yield reductions (up to 30%), which increased with time after flowering. Postbloom cluster division may help to optimize wine quality by improving grape maturity due to crop load reduction, reducing fungal contamination, and improving grape composition through the possibility of elongating the ripening period. Postbloom horizontal cluster division can be recommended as an efficient crop cultural tool for premium wine production under cool-climate conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postbloom cluster division loosened cluster structure in Pinot gris and Riesling.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Pinot gris and Rieslinge1
Treatment
postbloom cluster division treatmentse0
Outcome
cluster structuree0
Direction
loosene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both varieties, all postbloom cluster division treatments were able to loosen the cluster structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postbloom cluster division reduced bunch rot severity in both grape cultivars.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Material
Pinot gris and Rieslinge1
Treatment
postbloom cluster division treatmentse0
Outcome
bunch rot disease severitye0
Direction
reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both varieties, all postbloom cluster division treatments were able to loosen the cluster structure and reduce the bunch rot disease severity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 568–712 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later cluster division had more pronounced effects on grape cluster structure.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
cluster divisione0
Outcome
effects on cluster structuree0
Direction
more pronouncede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The later cluster division took place, the more pronounced were the effects on cluster structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–810 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density index was suitable to measure grape cluster structure.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Outcome
cluster structuree0
Qualifier
suitable measuree0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The density index was a suitable measure of the cluster structure and the predisposition to bunch rot infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Density index was suitable to measure predisposition to bunch rot infestation.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Outcome
predisposition to bunch rot infestatione0
Qualifier
suitable measuree0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The density index was a suitable measure of the cluster structure and the predisposition to bunch rot infestation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–925 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cluster division reduced grape yield by up to 30%.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
Cluster divisione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
up to 30%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster division resulted in yield reductions (up to 30%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–984 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield reductions from cluster division increased with time after flowering.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Treatment
Cluster divisione0
Outcome
yield reductionse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
time after floweringe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cluster division resulted in yield reductions (up to 30%), which increased with time after flowering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1027 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend postbloom horizontal cluster division for premium wine production in cool climates.

Taxon
Vitis vinifera L.Vitis viniferae1
Outcome
Postbloom horizontal cluster divisione0
Qualifier
under cool-climate conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis vinifera
Vitis vinifera · TaxonDarijanus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Postbloom horizontal cluster division can be recommended as an efficient crop cultural tool for premium wine production under cool-climate conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1268–1417 · show in text ↑
e1

“white Vitis vinifera L. cultivars Pinot gris and Riesling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 353–410 · show in text ↑

cluster · yield · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results differ

15 papers: 8 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

cluster · soil: physics · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

cluster · disease · Vitis vinifera (wine grape)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.