Abstract
In 4 trials in the Northern Wimmera of Victoria, the incidence and severity of take-all of wheat caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici were generally unaffected by tillage treatments (nil, chemical weed control; subsurface, blade plough and rod weeder; conventional scarifier, cultivator and harrows). At 1 site at 1 sampling time disease incidence was higher after conventional tillage than after subsurface tillage and at another site in 1 year out of 3, disease severity was greater after nil tillage than after conventional tillage. A stubble mulch of 4 t ha-1 of straw and burial at 5 or 10 cm reduced survival of the take-all fungus in wheat crowns.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Tillage treatments generally did not alter wheat take-all incidence or severity.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- tillage treatmentse0
- Interactor
- Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticie0pathogen
- Outcome
- incidence and severity of take-alle0
- Direction
- unaffectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the incidence and severity of take-all of wheat caused by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici were generally unaffected by tillage treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
At one site and sampling time, conventional tillage had higher disease incidence than subsurface tillage.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Qualifier
- At 1 site at 1 sampling timee0
- Comparator
- subsurface tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At 1 site at 1 sampling time disease incidence was higher after conventional tillage than after subsurface tillage”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
At another site, nil tillage produced greater disease severity than conventional tillage in one of three years.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- nil tillagee0
- Outcome
- disease severitye0
- Direction
- greatere0
- Qualifier
- 1 year out of 3e0
- Comparator
- conventional tillagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“at another site in 1 year out of 3, disease severity was greater after nil tillage than after conventional tillage”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Straw mulch and burial at 5 or 10 cm reduced take-all fungus survival in wheat crowns.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Organ / stage
- crownse0
- Treatment
- A stubble mulch of 4 t ha-1 of straw and burial at 5 or 10 cme0
- Outcome
- survival of the take-all funguse0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A stubble mulch of 4 t ha-1 of straw and burial at 5 or 10 cm reduced survival of the take-all fungus in wheat crowns”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 51 in the opposite direction
- positive
- negative
- positive
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →tillage · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- negative
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.