Paper · 2023 · Agronomy Science

Impact of cropping and tillage system on take-all disease of winter wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici)

Andrzej Woźniak; Leszek Rachoń; Myroslawa Soroka

3
claims
9
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Diseases induced by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici (G. g. tritici) are the most important wheat root diseases in all cropping areas around the world and significantly reduces yield and quality of wheat grain. A multi-year field experiment was used to evaluate infestation of winter wheat roots by G. g. tritici. The experimental factors included: I. cropping system (CS): 1) crop rotation (CR): pea – winter wheat – spring barley; 2) monoculture of winter wheat (MON); and II. tillage system (TS): 1) CT – conventional tillage, 2) RT – reduced tillage, and 3) NT – no-tillage. The following cultivation treatment were applied: a shallow ploughing after previous harvest and pre-sowing ploughing in the CT system; double cultivation instead of both aforementioned ploughing treatments in the RT system; and glyphosate in NT system. A cultivation set, consisting of a cultivator, a string roller, and a harrow, was used before wheat sowing. The value of the index of winter wheat roots infestation by G. g. tritici was significantly higher in the monoculture than in crop rotation. The value was also higher in NT than in CT system. In wheat monoculture with NT system, the percentage of highly and severely infested plants was higher than in crop rotation with CT system.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat root infestation was significantly higher in monoculture than crop rotation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
monoculturee0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticit0pathogen
Outcome
winter wheat roots infestatione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
crop rotatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“index of winter wheat roots infestation by G. g. tritici was significantly higher in the monoculture than in crop rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat root infestation was higher under no-tillage than conventional tillage.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
NTe0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticit0pathogen
Outcome
winter wheat roots infestatione1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
CTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The value was also higher in NT than in CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1086–1135 · show in text ↑
e1

“index of winter wheat roots infestation by G. g. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1018 · show in text ↑
e2

“NT – no-tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 566–581 · show in text ↑
e3

“CT – conventional tillage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 507–532 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly and severely infested winter wheat plants were more frequent under monoculture with no-tillage than rotation with conventional tillage.

Treatment
monoculture with NT systeme0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticit0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of highly and severely infested plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
crop rotation with CT systeme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat monoculture with NT system, the percentage of highly and severely infested plants was higher than in crop rotation with CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111 · show in text ↑

rotation · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

tillage · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.