Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Highly and severely infested winter wheat plants were more frequent under monoculture with no-tillage than rotation with conventional tillage.

A claim from Impact of cropping and tillage system on take-all disease of winter wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly and severely infested winter wheat plants were more frequent under monoculture with no-tillage than rotation with conventional tillage.

Treatment
monoculture with NT systeme0
Interactor
Gaeumannomyces graminis var. triticiGaeumannomyces triticit0pathogen
Outcome
percentage of highly and severely infested plantse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
crop rotation with CT systeme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In wheat monoculture with NT system, the percentage of highly and severely infested plants was higher than in crop rotation with CT system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1275
t0

“Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–111

Title

Impact of cropping and tillage system on take-all disease of winter wheat (Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici)

Andrzej Woźniak; Leszek Rachoń; Myroslawa Soroka Agronomy Science 2023. doi:10.24326/as.2023.5127

Other claims from this paper (2)

Record rev-25fdb2ef9ecf1ab6219265b52db48bcb2663a15ce357e1bf956d202720ffeb11 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

rotation · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

tillage · Gaeumannomyces tritici · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this claim

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.