Paper · 2006 · Journal of Phytopathology

Screening for Barley yellow dwarf virus‐Resistant Barley Genotypes by Assessment of Virus Content in Inoculated Seedlings

V. Šíp; L. ŠIrlová; J. Chrpová

8
claims
22
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The content of Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in roots and leaves of barley seedling plants differing in their level of resistance was assessed by quantitative ELISA 1–42 days after inoculation with the strain of BYDV (PAV). High virus accumulation in roots and low concentration in leaves was characteristic of the period 9–15 days after inoculation. In leaves, the differences in virus content between resistant and susceptible genotypes became significant after 15 days and resistance to virus accumulation was better expressed 30–39 days after inoculation. Roots of resistant materials exhibited evident retardation of virus accumulation and the greatest difference in virus content between resistant and susceptible plants was detected 9 days after inoculation. By these criteria, the selected winter and spring barley cultivars and lines (in total 44 materials) fell in to five groups according to field reactions and the presence or absence of the Yd2 resistance gene. There were highly significant and positive relations between ELISA values and 5‐year field data on symptomatic reactions and grain‐yield reductions due to infection. Using the described method, resistant and moderately resistant genotypes (both Yd2 and non‐ Yd2 ) were significantly differentiated from susceptible genotypes. The possible use of this method in screening for BYDV resistance is discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In roots, high BYDV accumulation was characteristic of the period 9–15 days after inoculation.

Organ / stage
rootse2
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Outcome
virus accumulatione2
Direction
Highe2
Qualifier
9–15 days after inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in roots and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“High virus accumulation in roots and low concentration in leaves was characteristic of the period 9–15 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–361 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In leaves, BYDV concentration was low during the period 9–15 days after inoculation.

Organ / stage
leavese2
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Outcome
concentratione2
Direction
lowe2
Qualifier
9–15 days after inoculatione2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in roots and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–76 · show in text ↑
e2

“High virus accumulation in roots and low concentration in leaves was characteristic of the period 9–15 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 236–361 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In leaves, virus content differed between resistant and susceptible genotypes significantly after 15 days after inoculation.

Material
resistant and susceptible genotypese3
Organ / stage
leavese3
Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Outcome
virus contente3
Qualifier
after 15 dayse3

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in roots and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–76 · show in text ↑
e3

“In leaves, the differences in virus content between resistant and susceptible genotypes became significant after 15 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 363–483 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In roots, resistant barley materials showed evident retardation of virus accumulation.

Material
resistant materialse4
Organ / stage
Rootse4
Outcome
virus accumulatione4
Direction
retardatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“Roots of resistant materials exhibited evident retardation of virus accumulation and the greatest difference in virus content between resistant and susceptible plants was detected 9 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–776 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In roots, the greatest difference in virus content between resistant and susceptible barley was detected 9 days after inoculation.

Material
resistant and susceptible plantse4
Organ / stage
Rootse4
Outcome
virus contente4
Direction
greateste4
Qualifier
9 days after inoculatione4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e4

“Roots of resistant materials exhibited evident retardation of virus accumulation and the greatest difference in virus content between resistant and susceptible plants was detected 9 days after inoculation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–776 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The selected winter and spring barley cultivars and lines (44 materials) fell into five groups by field reaction and the Yd2 resistance gene.

Material
winter and spring barley cultivars and linese6
Gene
Yd2e6
Outcome
five groupse6
Value
44 materialse6
Qualifier
according to field reactions and the presence or absence of the Yd2 resistance genee6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e6

“the selected winter and spring barley cultivars and lines (in total 44 materials) fell in to five groups according to field reactions and the presence or absence of the Yd2 resistance gene”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–985 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Virus content measured by ELISA had highly significant positive relations with 5-year field symptomatic reactions and grain-yield reductions.

Interactor
BYDVBarley yellow dwarf viruse1pathogen
Outcome
symptomatic reactionse2
Direction
positivee7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Barley yellow dwarf virus
Barley yellow dwarf virus · InteractorPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV) in roots and leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 24–76 · show in text ↑
e7

“positive relations between ELISA values and”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1064 · show in text ↑
e2

“on symptomatic reactions and grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1117 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The ELISA method significantly differentiated resistant and moderately resistant barley genotypes from susceptible genotypes.

Material
resistant and moderately resistant genotypese1
Outcome
differentiatede2
Comparator
susceptible genotypese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“barley seedling plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Using the described method, resistant and moderately resistant genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1153–1225 · show in text ↑
e2

“were significantly differentiated from susceptible genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1311 · show in text ↑