Paper · 2013 · Journal of Horticulture and Forestry

Effects of organic and inorganic fertilizers addition on growth and yield of banana (Musa AAA cv. Malindi) on a saline and non-saline soil in Oman

Khair Tuwair Said Al-Busaidi

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Water availability and soil salinity limit crop productivity in arid and semiarid regions such as Oman. The objective of this study was to examine the effects of amending a saline plant root zone soil with a non-saline sandy loam soil of organic and inorganic fertilizers, and of different placement methods on growth and yield of banana (Musa AAA cv. 'Malindi'). A total of 24 treatments comprising six fertilizer amendments, two soil types and two different application methods were tested. The amendments included four organic amendments versus un-composted dairy cow manure (FDM); composted dairy cow manure (CDM); CDM + 10% date palm straw (CDM + 10%DPS) by weight, and CDM + 30% date palm straw (CDM + 30% DPS) and two inorganic amendments (NPK and NPK plus foliar micronutrient spray, NPK+micro). The results revealed that neither soil amendments, fertilizer applications methods nor fertilizer composition significantly affected pseudostem height or girth, or leaf area. There was significant difference (P<0.05) in the number of leaves at flowering between Saline-Ring-NPK plants (8.2 leaves/plant) and Amended-Mixed-NPK and Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants (14.0 and 13.8 leaves/plant, respectively). Amended-Ring-NPK+micro was significantly early flowering (267 days) compared to the other treatments. Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants were harvested significantly earlier (in 339 days) than plants on saline soil. Amended-Ring-NPK+micro produced significantly higher average bunch fresh weight (9.5 kg/bunch/cycle) than all other treatments followed by Amended-Mixed-NPK+micro (5.9 kg/bunch/cycle). Key words: Dwarf cavendish, amendments, application methods, manure types, mineral fertilizers, yield components.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil amendments, fertilizer methods and composition did not significantly affect pseudostem height, girth or leaf area.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
soil amendments, fertilizer applications methods nor fertilizer compositione0
Outcome
pseudostem height or girth, or leaf areae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“neither soil amendments, fertilizer applications methods nor fertilizer composition significantly affected pseudostem height or girth, or leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 830–977 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, Amended-Mixed-NPK plants had 14.0 leaves/plant compared with 8.2 for Saline-Ring-NPK plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Mixed-NPKe0
Outcome
number of leaves at floweringe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
14.0e0
Qualifier
8.2 leaves/plante0
Comparator
Saline-Ring-NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference (P<0.05) in the number of leaves at flowering between Saline-Ring-NPK plants (8.2 leaves/plant) and Amended-Mixed-NPK and Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants (14.0 and 13.8 leaves/plant, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At flowering, Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants had 13.8 leaves/plant compared with 8.2 for Saline-Ring-NPK plants.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Ring-NPK+microe0
Outcome
number of leaves at floweringe0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
13.8 leaves/plante0
Qualifier
8.2 leaves/plante0
Comparator
Saline-Ring-NPKe0

Verbatim

e0

“significant difference (P<0.05) in the number of leaves at flowering between Saline-Ring-NPK plants (8.2 leaves/plant) and Amended-Mixed-NPK and Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants (14.0 and 13.8 leaves/plant, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1206 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended-Ring-NPK+micro flowered significantly earlier, at 267 days, than other treatments.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Ring-NPK+microe0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
earlye0
Value
267 dayse0
Comparator
the other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Amended-Ring-NPK+micro was significantly early flowering (267 days) compared to the other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1308 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended-Ring-NPK+micro was harvested significantly earlier, in 339 days, than plants on saline soil.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Ring-NPK+microe0
Outcome
harvestede0
Direction
earliere0
Value
339 dayse0
Comparator
plants on saline soile0

Verbatim

e0

“Amended-Ring-NPK+micro plants were harvested significantly earlier (in 339 days) than plants on saline soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1310–1417 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended-Ring-NPK+micro produced the highest average bunch fresh weight, 9.5 kg/bunch/cycle.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Ring-NPK+microe0
Outcome
average bunch fresh weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
9.5 kg/bunch/cyclee0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Verbatim

e0

“Amended-Ring-NPK+micro produced significantly higher average bunch fresh weight (9.5 kg/bunch/cycle) than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1419–1545 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Amended-Mixed-NPK+micro followed with 5.9 kg/bunch/cycle bunch fresh weight.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
Amended-Mixed-NPK+microe0
Outcome
average bunch fresh weighte1
Value
5.9 kg/bunch/cyclee0

Verbatim

e0

“followed by Amended-Mixed-NPK+micro (5.9 kg/bunch/cycle)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1546–1602 · show in text ↑
e1

“average bunch fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–83 · show in text ↑

other · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

91 papers: 80 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 80 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

87 papers more in this group

See all 91 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.