Paper · 2017 · International Journal of Pest Management

Effect of humic acid on Meloidogyne incognita (Kofoid & White) Chitwood infecting banana (Musa spp.)

N. Seenivasan; S. Senthilnathan

10
claims
28
verbatim quotes
22
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Humic acid, a natural by-product from lignite coals, was evaluated for its potential to control root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incogntia infecting banana. Hatching of M. incognita eggs was inhibited 50%–100% following incubation in 0.08%-2.0% humic acid in vitro. Exposure of juveniles (J2) of M. incognita to different humic acid concentrations significantly affected the mobility of J2 in vitro. The percent immobility of J2 increased with concentrations of humic acid up to 0.08%. In pot experiments, soil treatment with humic acid reduced the root galling in banana plantlets. All the humic acid tested concentrations (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.2% and 0.4%) significantly reduced the nematode soil density by 53.5%–56.7%, root infection by 61.9%–63.8%, egg population by 61.9%–63.8% and reproduction rate by 55.7%–56.6%. A significant improvement of growth of banana plantlets in terms of number of leaves, pseudostem height, girth, weight, root length and weight was noticed in humic acid treated pots. Humic acid did not suppress growth of the biocontrol agents Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride in vitro. Results suggest that soil treatment with humic acid at 0.04% not only offers significant nematode control but also improves growth of banana.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hatching of M. incognita eggs was inhibited by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
Hatching of M. incognita eggse0
Direction
inhibitede0
Value
50%–100%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Hatching of M. incognita eggs was inhibited 50%–100% following incubation in 0.08%-2.0% humic acid in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 156–263 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

mobility of J2 was affected by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pathogen
Outcome
mobility of J2e0
Direction
affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“Exposure of juveniles (J2) of M. incognita to different humic acid concentrations significantly affected the mobility of J2 in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 265–397 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

percent immobility of J2 was increased by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
percent immobility of J2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“The percent immobility of J2 increased with concentrations of humic acid up to 0.08%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–483 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

root galling was reduced by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root gallinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“soil treatment with humic acid reduced the root galling in banana plantlets”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 505–580 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

nematode soil density was reduced by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
nematode soil densitye0
Direction
reducede0
Value
53.5%–56.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the humic acid tested concentrations (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.2% and 0.4%) significantly reduced the nematode soil density by 53.5%–56.7%, root infection by 61.9%–63.8%, egg population by 61.9%–63.8% and reproduction rate by 55.7%–56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

root infection was reduced by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
root infectione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61.9%–63.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the humic acid tested concentrations (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.2% and 0.4%) significantly reduced the nematode soil density by 53.5%–56.7%, root infection by 61.9%–63.8%, egg population by 61.9%–63.8% and reproduction rate by 55.7%–56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

egg population was reduced by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
egg populatione0
Direction
reducede0
Value
61.9%–63.8%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the humic acid tested concentrations (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.2% and 0.4%) significantly reduced the nematode soil density by 53.5%–56.7%, root infection by 61.9%–63.8%, egg population by 61.9%–63.8% and reproduction rate by 55.7%–56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

reproduction rate was reduced by humic acid.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat1pathogen
Outcome
reproduction ratee0
Direction
reducede0
Value
55.7%–56.6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne incognita”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–45 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the humic acid tested concentrations (0.04%, 0.08%, 0.2% and 0.4%) significantly reduced the nematode soil density by 53.5%–56.7%, root infection by 61.9%–63.8%, egg population by 61.9%–63.8% and reproduction rate by 55.7%–56.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–814 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid significantly improved banana leaf number, pseudostem size and weight, and root length and weight.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
humic acide0
Outcome
growth of banana plantletse0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“A significant improvement of growth of banana plantlets in terms of number of leaves, pseudostem height, girth, weight, root length and weight was noticed in humic acid treated pots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–997 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid did not suppress growth of the tested biocontrol agents in vitro.

Taxon
bananat0
Outcome
growth of the biocontrol agents Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viridee0
Direction
did not suppresse0

Verbatim

t0

“banana (Musa spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–100 · show in text ↑
e0

“Humic acid did not suppress growth of the biocontrol agents Pseudomonas fluorescens and Trichoderma viride in vitro”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1114 · show in text ↑

other · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.