Paper · 2016 · Acta Scientiarum Agronomy

Roots of ‘BRS Princesa’ banana fertigated with humic substances and saponin-based plant extracts

Eugênio Ferreira Coelho; Diego Magalhães de Melo; Bruno Laecio Da Silva Pereira; et al.

2
claims
4
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of fertigation with humic substances, with and without the addition of plant extracts, on the root system of the 'BRS Princesa' banana cultivar. The banana crop was cultivated at a spacing of 2.0 x 2.5 m and fertigated using a drip system in a dystrocohesive Yellow Latosol. The experimental design was randomized blocks, in a split-split-plot scheme with five replicates, for the following factors: humic substance doses and presence of a plant extract formulation. The treatments consisted of five doses of humic substances, based on a reference dose of 14.14 L ha-1 cycle-1, in the presence and absence of plant extract. The variable root length (cm) was subjected to variance analyses to evaluate the effect of the humic substances, either isolated or in interaction with plant extract and soil depth. The use of the plant extract increased the effect of the humic substance on root length but overshadowed its effect for the different doses of humic substance. Root length was not sensitive to increasing humic substance dose with plant extract for doses of up to 42.42 L ha-1at 0 – 0.40 m depth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant extract increased the effect of humic substances on banana root length.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
plant extracte0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
humic substancee0

Verbatim

e0

“The use of the plant extract increased the effect of the humic substance on root length but overshadowed its effect for the different doses of humic substance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With plant extract, banana root length was not sensitive to increasing humic substance dose up to 42.42 L ha-1 at 0–0.40 m depth.

Taxon
bananat0
Treatment
increasing humic substance dose with plant extracte0
Outcome
Root lengthe0
Direction
not sensitivee0
Qualifier
up to 42.42 L ha-1at 0 – 0.40 m depthe0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Root length was not sensitive to increasing humic substance dose with plant extract for doses of up to 42.42 L ha-1at 0 – 0.40 m depth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1142 · show in text ↑
t0

“banana”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑

other · growth · MusaPositive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

botanical · growth · MusaResults agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.