Paper · 2000

Sulfur and grain quality in autumn sown milling wheat cv. Monad.

M. D. Craighead

3
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Two experiments on winter wheat involving sulphur treatments showed variable herbage and grain protein responses to sulphur (S). In one experiment herbage S levels were increased through sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extension but grain S did not differ. In a second experiment, the use of spring nitrogen fertilisers containing ammonium sulphate significantly increased grain protein values over those not containing S.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extension increased herbage S levels in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
herbagee1
Treatment
sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extensione1
Outcome
herbage S levelse1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experiments on winter wheat involving sulphur treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“In one experiment herbage S levels were increased through sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–244 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extension did not change grain S in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
graine2
Treatment
sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extensione1
Outcome
grain Se2
Direction
did not differe2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experiments on winter wheat involving sulphur treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e1

“In one experiment herbage S levels were increased through sulphate S application at tillering or mid stem extension”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–244 · show in text ↑
e2

“but grain S did not differ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 245–271 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Spring nitrogen fertilisers containing ammonium sulphate significantly increased grain protein values relative to fertilisers not containing S in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
graine3
Treatment
spring nitrogen fertilisers containing ammonium sulphatee3
Outcome
grain protein valuese3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
those not containing Se3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two experiments on winter wheat involving sulphur treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–60 · show in text ↑
e3

“the use of spring nitrogen fertilisers containing ammonium sulphate significantly increased grain protein values over those not containing S”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 297–437 · show in text ↑

ammonium sulfate · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

566 papers: 501 positive, 65 negative or no effect

500 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

562 papers more in this group

See all 566 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.