Paper · 1964 · Annals of Applied Biology

The effect of kinetin on infection of petunia and tomato leaves with tomato spotted‐wilt virus

I. W. SELMAN

10
claims
17
verbatim quotes
36
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY Kinetin supplied to the lower surfaces of petunia leaf strips reduced the number and size of local lesions following mechanical inoculation of the upper surfaces with tomato spotted‐wilt virus' (TSWV). Glucose increased lesion production, but glucose with kinetin reduced it. Kinetin mixed with infective sap did not affect lesion production. Lesions were increased with increasing water content of leaf strip and the regression equation for the relationship is given. Treatment with kinetin after inoculation reduced lesion production over a wide range of water contents, but was most effective at high values. Kinetin inhibited virus multiplication in excised tomato leaflets only when supplied at the site of infection and caused some necrosis of veins and midribs. Treated leaflets took up more water than controls and uptake continued for 4 days. Water uptake by kinetin‐treated petunia leaf strips was less than by controls but continued for 6 days with only slight discoloration of the veins. It is suggested that the inhibitory effect of kinetin may be associated with a capacity to cause increased activity of ribonuclease in the tissues.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin reduced local lesion number and size after virus inoculation in petunia.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniae0
Treatment
Kinetin supplied to the lower surfacese0
Interactor
tomato spotted‐wilt virusOrthotospovirus tomatomaculaee0pathogen
Outcome
number and size of local lesionse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae
Orthotospovirus tomatomaculae · InteractorWilliam M. Brown Jr., Bugwood.org · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin supplied to the lower surfaces of petunia leaf strips reduced the number and size of local lesions following mechanical inoculation of the upper surfaces with tomato spotted‐wilt virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 8–200 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose increased petunia lesion production.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Glucosee0
Outcome
lesion productione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucose increased lesion production, but glucose with kinetin reduced it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–283 · show in text ↑
t0

“petunia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glucose with kinetin reduced petunia lesion production.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
glucose with kinetine0
Outcome
lesion productione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Glucose increased lesion production, but glucose with kinetin reduced it.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–283 · show in text ↑
t0

“petunia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin mixed with infective sap did not affect lesion production.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
Kinetin mixed with infective sape0
Outcome
lesion productione0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin mixed with infective sap did not affect lesion production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–350 · show in text ↑
t0

“petunia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lesions increased with leaf-strip water content.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniat0
Organ / stage
leaf stripe0
Outcome
Lesionse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lesions were increased with increasing water content of leaf strip”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 351–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“petunia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin after inoculation reduced lesions across water contents, especially high values.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniat0
Treatment
kinetin after inoculatione0
Outcome
lesion productione0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
most effective at high valuese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with kinetin after inoculation reduced lesion production over a wide range of water contents, but was most effective at high values.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 477–619 · show in text ↑
t0

“petunia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin inhibited virus multiplication in tomato only at the infection site.

Treatment
Kinetine0
Outcome
virus multiplicatione0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
only when supplied at the site of infectione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Kinetin inhibited virus multiplication in excised tomato leaflets only when supplied at the site of infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–729 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin caused necrosis of tomato veins and midribs.

Treatment
kinetint0
Outcome
necrosis of veins and midribse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“caused some necrosis of veins and midribs.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–776 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinetin on infection of petunia and tomato leaves with tomato spotted‐wilt virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin-treated tomato leaflets took up more water than controls for four days.

Treatment
kinetint0
Outcome
watere0
Direction
moree0
Value
4 dayse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treated leaflets took up more water than controls and uptake continued for 4 days.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 777–859 · show in text ↑
t0

“kinetin on infection of petunia and tomato leaves with tomato spotted‐wilt virus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 14–94 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kinetin-treated petunia strips took up less water than controls but continued for six days.

Taxon
petuniaPetuniae0
Treatment
kinetin‐treatede0
Outcome
Water uptakee0
Direction
lesse0
Value
6 dayse0
Comparator
controlse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Petunia
Petunia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorySalwa Farwaneh Dameh · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water uptake by kinetin‐treated petunia leaf strips was less than by controls but continued for 6 days with only slight discoloration of the veins.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 860–1007 · show in text ↑

kinetin · disease · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · disease · Petunia (petunia)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.