Paper · 2008 · Chilean journal of agricultural research

Condensed Tannin Concentrations of Three Lotus Species Grown in Different Environments

Hernán Acuña; Alex Concha; Marcos Figueroa

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
28
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Condensed tannins (CT) present in Lotus spp., depending on their concentration in the plant, can prevent bloating and improve protein absorption in ruminants. With the objective to know the variability of this characteristic, the CT concentration (% dry matter basis) was determined by the butanol-HCl procedure in 13 cultivars of Lotus corniculatus L. (Lc) introduced from North and South America and Oceania, 11 accessions of Lotus tenuis Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. (Lt), and 22 accessions of Lotus uliginosus Schkuhr (Lu) collected in Chile, from 32 to 38 S and 36 to 46 S, respectively. The field experiments, with two randomized complete blocks, were established in autumn 1998, in five different environments in the central-southern zone of Chile (clay soil, sandy soil, and three volcanic soils with different levels of water availability). The herbage sampling was conducted in spring-summer 1999-2000, when the plants were in full flowering. Significant differences between cultivars or accessions were found within each site, in total CT and/or in extractable or protein or fiber bound fractions of CT concentrations. The Lc and Lu genotypes showed high variability, with a range of 4.7 to 8.7% and 6.3 to 11.0%, and means of 6.1 and 8.2%, respectively, of total CT. The Lt general mean was 4.8%, considerably higher than the figures reported in the literature, and had low variability. This information will contribute to select genotypes for the improvement of this species by selection and breeding.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Significant differences between cultivars or accessions were found within each site in total condensed tannins and/or in the extractable, protein-bound or fiber-bound fractions of CT concentration.

Taxon
Lotus spp.Lotuse0
Outcome
total CT and/or in extractable or protein or fiber bound fractions of CT concentrationse1
Qualifier
within each sitee1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus
Lotus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)André Karwath aka Aka · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Condensed tannins (CT) present in Lotus spp.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–44 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant differences between cultivars or accessions were found within each site, in total CT and/or in extractable or protein or fiber bound fractions of CT concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 949–1124 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lotus corniculatus genotypes showed high variability in total CT, with a range of 4.7 to 8.7% and a mean of 6.1%.

Taxon
Lotus corniculatusLotus corniculatuse0
Outcome
total CTe1
Value
4.7 to 8.7%e1
Qualifier
high variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus corniculatus
Lotus corniculatus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“13 cultivars of Lotus corniculatus L. (Lc)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–357 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Lc and Lu genotypes showed high variability, with a range of 4.7 to 8.7% and 6.3 to 11.0%, and means of 6.1 and 8.2%, respectively, of total CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lotus uliginosus genotypes showed high variability in total CT, with a range of 6.3 to 11.0% and a mean of 8.2%.

Taxon
Lotus uliginosusLotus uliginosuse0
Outcome
total CTe1
Value
6.3 to 11.0%e1
Qualifier
high variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus uliginosus
Lotus uliginosus · TaxonForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“22 accessions of Lotus uliginosus Schkuhr (Lu)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 476–522 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Lc and Lu genotypes showed high variability, with a range of 4.7 to 8.7% and 6.3 to 11.0%, and means of 6.1 and 8.2%, respectively, of total CT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1273 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The general mean total CT of Lotus tenuis was 4.8%, considerably higher than figures reported in the literature.

Taxon
Lotus tenuisLotus tenuise0
Outcome
general meane1
Direction
considerably highere1
Value
4.8%e1
Comparator
figures reported in the literaturee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus tenuis
Lotus tenuis · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 16:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11 accessions of Lotus tenuis Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. (Lt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“The Lt general mean was 4.8%, considerably higher than the figures reported in the literature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1275–1368 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lotus tenuis had low variability in CT concentration.

Taxon
Lotus tenuisLotus tenuise0
Outcome
low variabilitye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lotus tenuis
Lotus tenuis · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 16:12, 18 November 2006 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“11 accessions of Lotus tenuis Waldst. & Kit. ex Willd. (Lt)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 411–470 · show in text ↑
e1

“had low variability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1393 · show in text ↑