Paper · 1969 · Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Notes on the vegetative morphology and anatomy of the Petermanniaceae (Monocotyledones)

P. B. TOMLINSON; E. S. AYENSU

4
claims
5
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The microscopic anatomy of the vegetative parts of Petermannia cirrhosa is described for the first time. This information lends support to the exclusion of Petermannia from the Dioscorea-ceae with which it has been tentatively associated, the vascular anatomy of the two being quite dissimilar. No satisfactory explanation of the peculiar leaf-opposed position of the tendrils (inflorescence homologues) can be offered, except that it clearly cannot be accounted for by sympodial growth. Vascular tissues in Petermannia are very unspecialized.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vegetative microscopic anatomy of Petermannia cirrhosa was described for the first time.

Taxon
Petermannia cirrhosae0
Outcome
microscopic anatomy of the vegetative partse0

Verbatim

e0

“The microscopic anatomy of the vegetative parts of Petermannia cirrhosa is described for the first time.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–104 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petermannia vascular anatomy differs from that of Dioscorea-ceae, supporting its exclusion from that group.

Taxon
PetermanniaPetermanniae0
Outcome
vascular anatomye0
Comparator
Dioscorea-ceaee0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“This information lends support to the exclusion of Petermannia from the Dioscorea-ceae with which it has been tentatively associated, the vascular anatomy of the two being quite dissimilar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 105–294 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sympodial growth cannot explain the leaf-opposed position of Petermannia tendrils.

Taxon
PetermanniaPetermanniat0
Outcome
leaf-opposed position of the tendrilse0
Qualifier
sympodial growthe0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“No satisfactory explanation of the peculiar leaf-opposed position of the tendrils (inflorescence homologues) can be offered, except that it clearly cannot be accounted for by sympodial growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Petermanniaceae”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–69 · show in text ↑