Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The wild progenitors of the Near Eastern legumes have low germination rates mediated by hardseededness. Hence it was argued that cultivation of these wild legumes would probably result in no yield gain. Based on the meagre natural yield of wild lentil and its poor germination, it was suggested that wild Near Eastern grain legumes were unlikely to have been adopted for cultivation unless freely germinating types were available for the incipient farmers. Unlike wild cereals, data from experimental cultivation of wild legumes are lacking. METHODS: Replicated nurseries of wild pea (Pisum elatius, P. humile and P. fulvum) were sown during 2007-2010 in the Mediterranean district of Israel. To assess the effect of hardseededness on the yield potential, seeds of the wild species were either subjected to scarification (to ensure germination) or left intact, and compared with domesticated controls. KEY RESULTS: Sowing intact wild pea seeds mostly resulted in net yield loss due to poor establishment caused by wild-type low germination rates, while ensuring crop establishment by scarification resulted in net, although modest, yield gain, despite considerable losses due to pod dehiscence. Harvest efficiency of the wild pea plots was significantly higher (2-5 kg seeds h(-1)) compared with foraging efficiency in wild pea populations (ranging from a few grams to 0·6 kg h(-1)). CONCLUSIONS: Germination and yield data from 'cultivation' of wild pea suggest that Near Eastern legumes are unlikely to have been domesticated via a protracted process. Put differently, the agronomic implications of the hardseededness of wild legumes are incompatible with a millennia-long scenario of unconscious selection processes leading to 'full' domestication. This is because net yield loss in cultivation attempts is most likely to have resulted in abandonment of the respective species within a short time frame, rather than perpetual unprofitable cultivation for several centuries or millennia.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 3
Claim · model-written summary
Sowing intact wild pea seeds mostly caused net yield loss through poor establishment.
- Taxon
- wild pea
Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. bifloruse0 - Material
- intact wild pea seedse0
- Outcome
- net yield losse0
- Direction
- losse0
- Qualifier
- poor establishment caused by wild-type low germination ratese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Sowing intact wild pea seeds mostly resulted in net yield loss due to poor establishment caused by wild-type low germination rates”
Claim · model-written summary
Scarification gave a modest net yield gain despite pod-dehiscence losses.
- Treatment
- scarificatione0
- Outcome
- yield gaine0
- Direction
- gaine0
- Qualifier
- despite considerable losses due to pod dehiscencee0
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“ensuring crop establishment by scarification resulted in net, although modest, yield gain, despite considerable losses due to pod dehiscence.”
t0“wild pea”
Claim · model-written summary
Harvest efficiency in cultivated wild pea plots exceeded foraging efficiency in wild populations.
- Taxon
- wild pea
Lathyrus oleraceus subsp. bifloruse0 - Outcome
- Harvest efficiencye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2-5 kg seeds h(-1)e0
- Qualifier
- ranging from a few grams to 0·6 kg h(-1)e0
- Comparator
- foraging efficiency in wild pea populationse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Harvest efficiency of the wild pea plots was significantly higher (2-5 kg seeds h(-1)) compared with foraging efficiency in wild pea populations (ranging from a few grams to 0·6 kg h(-1)).”
The same questions in other papers
seed treatment · yield · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.