Paper · 1996 · New Phytologist

The effects of shade on seedlings of Orchis morio and Dactylorhiza fuchsii in chalk and clay soil

S. L. MCKENDRICK

11
claims
22
verbatim quotes
17
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

summary The responses of two native British orchids, Orchis morio L. and Dactylorhiza fuchsii (Druce) Soó, to shading were tested using 7‐ and 8‐month‐old symbiotically propagated seedlings. Seedlings were raised in culture, set into tubes of clay and chalk soil and grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber in deep green shade, green shade, neutral shade, and unshaded (photosynthetic photon fluence rates (PPFR) 24, 54, 54 and 225 μmol m −2 s −1 respectively). The dicotyledonous perennial Leontodon hispidus L. was also tested for comparison. The orchids tolerated shade more than did L. hispidus , in which a decrease in PPFR led to a decrease in d.wt, an increase in specific lead area (SLA) and elongation of the petioles. In O. morio , lower PPFR led to only a slight decrease in d.wt in the most shaded treatment, an increase in SLA similar to that of L. hispidus , and an increase in the vertical inclination of some leaves. In D. fuchsii lower PPFR led to a reduction in d.wt, mainly in the roots at higher, and in the leaves at lower, photon irradiance. A change from neutral to green shade reduced growth in L. hispidus , but had no effect on either orchid. The physiological and ecological implications of shade tolerance in orchid seedlings are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Orchids tolerated shade more than Leontodon hispidus did.

Taxon
orchidse0
Treatment
shadee0
Outcome
tolerated shadee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
L. hispiduse0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Verbatim

e0

“The orchids tolerated shade more than did L. hispidus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–630 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate reduced dry weight of Leontodon hispidus.

Taxon
L. hispidusLeontodon hispiduse0
Treatment
a decrease in PPFRe0
Outcome
d.wte0
Direction
decreasee0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leontodon hispidus
Leontodon hispidus · TaxonUser:Tigerente · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The orchids tolerated shade more than did L. hispidus , in which a decrease in PPFR led to a decrease in d.wt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–686 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate increased specific leaf area (SLA) of Leontodon hispidus.

Taxon
L. hispidusLeontodon hispiduse0
Treatment
a decrease in PPFRe0
Outcome
specific lead area (SLA)e0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leontodon hispidus
Leontodon hispidus · TaxonUser:Tigerente · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The orchids tolerated shade more than did L. hispidus , in which a decrease in PPFR led to a decrease in d.wt, an increase in specific lead area (SLA) and elongation of the petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–758 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate caused elongation of the petioles of Leontodon hispidus.

Taxon
L. hispidusLeontodon hispiduse0
Treatment
a decrease in PPFRe0
Outcome
elongation of the petiolese0
Direction
elongatione0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leontodon hispidus
Leontodon hispidus · TaxonUser:Tigerente · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The orchids tolerated shade more than did L. hispidus , in which a decrease in PPFR led to a decrease in d.wt, an increase in specific lead area (SLA) and elongation of the petioles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 577–758 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Orchis morio, lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate caused only a slight decrease in dry weight in the most shaded treatment.

Taxon
O. morioAnacamptis morioe0
Treatment
lower PPFRe0
Outcome
d.wte0
Direction
slight decreasee0
Qualifier
in the most shaded treatmente0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anacamptis morio
Anacamptis morio · TaxonDidier Desouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In O. morio , lower PPFR led to only a slight decrease in d.wt in the most shaded treatment, an increase in SLA similar to that of L. hispidus , and an increase in the vertical inclination of some leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–963 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Orchis morio, lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate increased SLA similarly to Leontodon hispidus.

Taxon
O. morioAnacamptis morioe0
Treatment
lower PPFRe0
Outcome
SLAe0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
similar to that of L. hispiduse0
Comparator
L. hispiduse0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anacamptis morio
Anacamptis morio · TaxonDidier Desouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In O. morio , lower PPFR led to only a slight decrease in d.wt in the most shaded treatment, an increase in SLA similar to that of L. hispidus , and an increase in the vertical inclination of some leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–963 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Orchis morio, lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate increased the vertical inclination of some leaves.

Taxon
O. morioAnacamptis morioe0
Treatment
lower PPFRe0
Outcome
vertical inclination of some leavese0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Anacamptis morio
Anacamptis morio · TaxonDidier Desouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In O. morio , lower PPFR led to only a slight decrease in d.wt in the most shaded treatment, an increase in SLA similar to that of L. hispidus , and an increase in the vertical inclination of some leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–963 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Dactylorhiza fuchsii, lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate reduced dry weight mainly in roots at higher photon irradiance.

Taxon
D. fuchsiiDactylorhiza fuchsiie0
Organ / stage
rootse0
Treatment
lower PPFRe0
Outcome
d.wte0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
at highere0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylorhiza fuchsii
Dactylorhiza fuchsii · TaxonUoaei1 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In D. fuchsii lower PPFR led to a reduction in d.wt, mainly in the roots at higher, and in the leaves at lower, photon irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1094 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In Dactylorhiza fuchsii, lower photosynthetic photon fluence rate reduced dry weight mainly in leaves at lower photon irradiance.

Taxon
D. fuchsiiDactylorhiza fuchsiie0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
lower PPFRe0
Outcome
d.wte0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
at lowere0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Dactylorhiza fuchsii
Dactylorhiza fuchsii · TaxonUoaei1 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In D. fuchsii lower PPFR led to a reduction in d.wt, mainly in the roots at higher, and in the leaves at lower, photon irradiance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1094 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing from neutral to green shade reduced growth of Leontodon hispidus.

Taxon
L. hispidusLeontodon hispiduse0
Treatment
change from neutral to green shadee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
neutrale0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Leontodon hispidus
Leontodon hispidus · TaxonUser:Tigerente · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A change from neutral to green shade reduced growth in L. hispidus , but had no effect on either orchid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1199 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing from neutral to green shade had no effect on the growth of either orchid.

Taxon
orchide0
Treatment
change from neutral to green shadee0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
neutrale0
Setting
controlled environment chambere7

Verbatim

e0

“A change from neutral to green shade reduced growth in L. hispidus , but had no effect on either orchid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1096–1199 · show in text ↑
e7

“grown under shade screens for 10‐wk in a controlled environment chamber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 267–338 · show in text ↑