Paper · 1999 · Remediation Journal

Phytoremediation of lead‐contaminated soil at a New Jersey Brownfield site

Michael J. Blaylock; Mark P. Elless; Jianwei W. Huang; et al.

2
claims
8
verbatim quotes
32
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Phytoremediation is a new technology that uses specially selected metal‐accumulating plants as an attractive and economical method to clean up soils contaminated with heavy metals and radionuclides. The integration of specially selected metal‐accumulating crop plants (Brassica juncea (L) Czern.) with innovative soil amendments allows plants to achieve high biomass and metal accumulation rates. In a recent study conducted at a lead‐contaminated site in Trenton, New Jersey, the soil was treated with phytoremediation using successive crops of B. juncea combined with soil amendments. Through phytoremediation, the average surface soil lead concentration was reduced by 13 percent. In addition, the target soil concentration of 400 mg/kg was achieved in approximately 72 percent of the treated area in one cropping season.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phytoremediation with successive Brassica juncea crops and soil amendments reduced average surface soil lead concentration by 13 percent.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Treatment
successive crops of B. juncea combined with soil amendmentse1
Outcome
average surface soil lead concentratione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
13 percente2
Setting
Trenton, New Jerseye4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(Brassica juncea (L) Czern.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil was treated with phytoremediation using successive crops of B. juncea combined with soil amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–594 · show in text ↑
e2

“the average surface soil lead concentration was reduced by 13 percent”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–691 · show in text ↑
e4

“in Trenton, New Jersey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–484 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The target soil lead concentration of 400 mg/kg was achieved in about 72 percent of the treated area in one cropping season.

Taxon
Brassica junceaBrassica junceae0
Treatment
successive crops of B. juncea combined with soil amendmentse1
Outcome
target soil concentratione3
Value
72 percente3
Setting
Trenton, New Jerseye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“(Brassica juncea (L) Czern.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–305 · show in text ↑
e1

“the soil was treated with phytoremediation using successive crops of B. juncea combined with soil amendments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–594 · show in text ↑
e3

“the target soil concentration of 400 mg/kg was achieved in approximately 72 percent of the treated area in one cropping season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–832 · show in text ↑
e4

“in Trenton, New Jersey”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–484 · show in text ↑

other · molecular: metabolites · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.