Abstract
Plant spacing required for optimum crop productivity depends on morpho-physiological traits between varieties, and the interaction between genotype and the environment. Studies were conducted in Ibadan (7°38’N 3°84’E) Nigeria, at the Institute of Agricultural Research and Training (IAR and T) during 2006 and 2007 to determine the influence of row spacing on seed yield in kenaf variety, Ifeken 400, bred for adaptation to the South Western Nigeria agro-ecologies. The experiment was carried out using split plot experimental design with two inter-row spacing (25 and 50 cm) as main plot and five intra-row spacing (5, 10, 15, 20 and 25 cm) as sub-plot. Results showed that plant height was not influenced by the inter-row or intra-row spacing. Height ranged from 1.91-2.03 m in 2006 and 2.31-2.58 m in 2007. Mid stem girth varied significantly within inter and intra-row densities, while butt girth increased with intra-row spacing. Number of capsules was not influenced by the intra-row spacing. An average of 25 and 18 capsules per plant were recorded in 2006 and 2007 respectively. Although, 100 seed weight (g) was not influenced by inter or intra-row spacing, it was lower in 2006 (0.44 g) than in 2007 (2.21 g). Seed yield was highest from 50 cm inter-row spacing and 20 cm intra-row with 260 kg/ha and 540.5 kg/ha in 2006 and 2007 respectively. The difference in seed yield between the row spacing was significant in 2007. However, it was observed that time of planting and rainfall pattern in 2007 has more effect on higher seed weight and seed yield than in 2006. Key words: Kenaf, row spacing, seed yield, plant height, stem girth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Plant height of kenaf was not influenced by inter-row or intra-row spacing.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- inter-row or intra-row spacinge1
- Outcome
- plant heighte1
- Direction
- not influencede1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e1“Results showed that plant height was not influenced by the inter-row or intra-row spacing”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Mid stem girth of kenaf varied significantly within inter and intra-row densities.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- inter and intra-row densitiese2
- Outcome
- Mid stem girthe2
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Mid stem girth varied significantly within inter and intra-row densities, while butt girth increased with intra-row spacing”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Butt girth of kenaf increased with intra-row spacing.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- intra-row spacinge2
- Outcome
- butt girthe2
- Direction
- increasede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e2“Mid stem girth varied significantly within inter and intra-row densities, while butt girth increased with intra-row spacing”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of capsules of kenaf was not influenced by intra-row spacing.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- intra-row spacinge3
- Outcome
- Number of capsulese3
- Direction
- not influencede3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e3“Number of capsules was not influenced by the intra-row spacing”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Kenaf plants bore an average of 25 and 18 capsules per plant in 2006 and 2007.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Outcome
- capsules per plante4
- Value
- 25 and 18 capsules per plante4
- Qualifier
- 2006 and 2007e4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e4“An average of 25 and 18 capsules per plant were recorded in 2006 and 2007 respectively”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
100 seed weight of kenaf was not influenced by inter or intra-row spacing.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- inter or intra-row spacinge5
- Outcome
- 100 seed weight (g)e5
- Direction
- not influencede5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Although, 100 seed weight (g) was not influenced by inter or intra-row spacing, it was lower in 2006 (0.44 g) than in 2007 (2.21 g)”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
100 seed weight of kenaf was lower in 2006 (0.44 g) than in 2007 (2.21 g).
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Outcome
- 100 seed weighte5
- Direction
- lowere5
- Value
- 0.44 ge5
- Qualifier
- 2.21 ge5
- Comparator
- 2007e5
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e5“Although, 100 seed weight (g) was not influenced by inter or intra-row spacing, it was lower in 2006 (0.44 g) than in 2007 (2.21 g)”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield of kenaf was highest at 50 cm inter-row and 20 cm intra-row spacing in 2006 (260 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- 50 cm inter-row spacing and 20 cm intra-rowe6
- Outcome
- Seed yielde6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Value
- 260 kg/hae6
- Qualifier
- in 2006e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Seed yield was highest from 50 cm inter-row spacing and 20 cm intra-row with 260 kg/ha and 540.5 kg/ha in 2006 and 2007 respectively”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield of kenaf was highest at 50 cm inter-row and 20 cm intra-row spacing in 2007 (540.5 kg/ha).
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- 50 cm inter-row spacing and 20 cm intra-rowe6
- Outcome
- Seed yielde6
- Direction
- higheste6
- Value
- 540.5 kg/hae6
- Qualifier
- 2007e6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e6“Seed yield was highest from 50 cm inter-row spacing and 20 cm intra-row with 260 kg/ha and 540.5 kg/ha in 2006 and 2007 respectively”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Row spacing had a significant effect on kenaf seed yield in 2007.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- row spacinge7
- Outcome
- seed yielde7
- Qualifier
- in 2007e7
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“The difference in seed yield between the row spacing was significant in 2007”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
Claim · model-written summary
Time of planting and rainfall pattern in 2007 had more effect on higher seed weight and seed yield of kenaf than in 2006.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- time of planting and rainfall patterne7
- Outcome
- higher seed weight and seed yielde7
- Direction
- higherinferrede7
- Comparator
- 2006e7
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e7“it was observed that time of planting and rainfall pattern in 2007 has more effect on higher seed weight and seed yield than in 2006”
t0“kenaf ( Hibiscus cannabinus ) variety”
The same questions in other papers
density · growth · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- no effect
density · yield · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.