Paper · 2008 · Weed Technology

Utility of Reduced Rates of Diclosulam, Flumioxazin, and Imazapic for Weed Management in Peanut

Samuel D. Willingham; Barry J. Brecke; Joyce Treadaway-Ducar; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field studies were conducted in 2002 and 2003 to determine the effects of herbicides applied below suggested use rates on weed management, yield, and estimated net return of peanut in both narrow and wide row-spacing regimes. In the single row-spacing regime study, diclosulam at 6 g/ha (1/4×) (1/4 labeled use rate) plus flumioxazin at 26 g/ha (1/4×) applied PRE followed by (fb) imazapic POST at 17, (1/4×), 35, (1/2×), or 70, (1×) g/ha was the lowest herbicide input that provided at least 80% control of sicklepod, yellow nutsedge, Florida beggarweed, and hairy indigo at 21 d after treatment (DAT). By 42 DAT, weed control was ≥ 80%, similar to herbicide treatments applied at labeled rates. In the twin row-spacing regime study at Jay, FL, and Citra, FL, in 2003, yellow nutsedge control was lowest (83 to 85%) from diclosulam applied at 1/4× in combination with flumioxazin at 1/4× PRE and flumioxazin at 1/4× or 52 g/ha (1/2×) PRE alone. All other herbicide treatments provided > 90% control. Diclosulam at 13 g/ha (1/2×) fb imazapic at 1/2× and flumioxazin at 1/4× fb imazapic at 1/2× was the lowest rate combination that provided > 80% control of sicklepod. Florida beggarweed control was > 90% with all rate combinations except diclosulam PRE alone, diclosulam at 1/4× PRE fb imazapic at 1/4× POST, and imazapic at 1/4× alone POST. Net return in the single-row spacing regime was highest for flumioxazin at 105 g/ha (1×) PRE alone, diclosulam at 1/4× applied with flumioxazin at 1/4× PRE alone or fb imazapic at 1× ($1,114, $1,094, and $990/ha, respectively). The twin row-spacing regime net return was highest with diclosulam PRE alone at 1/4, 1/2, or 26 g/ha (1×) ($2,063, $1,846, $1,734/ha, respectively). Diclosulam applied with flumioxazin at 1/2× fb imazapic at 1/2× was the lowest herbicide tank-mix input providing high net return at $1,162/ha.Nomenclature: Diclosulam, flumioxazin, imazapic, Florida beggarweed, Desmodium tortuosum (Sw.) DC., hairy indigo, Indigofera hirsuta Harvey, sicklepod, Senna obtusifolia (L.) H.S. Irwin & Barneby, yellow nutsedge, Cyperus esculentus L., peanut, Arachis hypogaea L. ‘C-99R’

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The low input diclosulam plus flumioxazin PRE followed by imazapic POST controlled four weeds at least 80% at 21 DAT.

Treatment
diclosulam at 6 g/ha (1/4×) (1/4 labeled use rate) plus flumioxazin at 26 g/ha (1/4×) applied PRE followed by (fb) imazapic POST at 17, (1/4×), 35, (1/2×), or 70, (1×) g/hae0
Interactor
sicklepode0
Outcome
control of sicklepod, yellow nutsedge, Florida beggarweed, and hairy indigoe0
Direction
at leaste0
Value
80%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“diclosulam at 6 g/ha (1/4×) (1/4 labeled use rate) plus flumioxazin at 26 g/ha (1/4×) applied PRE followed by (fb) imazapic POST at 17, (1/4×), 35, (1/2×), or 70, (1×) g/ha was the lowest herbicide input that provided at least 80% control of sicklepod, yellow nutsedge, Florida beggarweed, and hairy indigo at 21 d after treatment (DAT)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–602 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control reached at least 80% by 42 DAT, similar to labeled rates.

Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
similare0
Value
≥ 80%e0
Comparator
herbicide treatments applied at labeled ratese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By 42 DAT, weed control was ≥ 80%, similar to herbicide treatments applied at labeled rates.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–696 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In twin rows, the specified reduced diclosulam and flumioxazin treatments had the lowest yellow nutsedge control of 83 to 85%.

Treatment
diclosulam applied at 1/4× in combination with flumioxazin at 1/4× PREe0
Interactor
yellow nutsedgee0
Outcome
yellow nutsedge controle0
Direction
loweste0
Value
83 to 85%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yellow nutsedge control was lowest (83 to 85%) from diclosulam applied at 1/4× in combination with flumioxazin at 1/4× PRE and flumioxazin at 1/4× or 52 g/ha (1/2×) PRE alone”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 770–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other herbicide treatments controlled yellow nutsedge by over 90%.

Outcome
controle0
Value
> 90%e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All other herbicide treatments provided > 90% control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1000 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest rate combinations yielding over 80% sicklepod control were diclosulam or flumioxazin followed by imazapic.

Interactor
sicklepode0
Outcome
control of sicklepode0
Direction
loweste0
Value
> 80%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclosulam at 13 g/ha (1/2×) fb imazapic at 1/2× and flumioxazin at 1/4× fb imazapic at 1/2× was the lowest rate combination that provided > 80% control of sicklepod.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1167 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most combinations controlled Florida beggarweed by over 90%, with three named exceptions.

Interactor
Florida beggarweedDesmodium tortuosume0
Outcome
Florida beggarweed controle0
Value
> 90%e0
Qualifier
except diclosulam PRE alone, diclosulam at 1/4× PRE fb imazapic at 1/4× POST, and imazapic at 1/4× alone POSTe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗
Desmodium tortuosum
Desmodium tortuosum · InteractorForest & Kim Starr · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Florida beggarweed control was > 90% with all rate combinations except diclosulam PRE alone, diclosulam at 1/4× PRE fb imazapic at 1/4× POST, and imazapic at 1/4× alone POST.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1342 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In single rows, flumioxazin PRE alone had the highest listed net return of $1,114/ha.

Treatment
flumioxazin at 105 g/ha (1×) PRE alonee0
Outcome
Net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
$1,114e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Net return in the single-row spacing regime was highest for flumioxazin at 105 g/ha (1×) PRE alone, diclosulam at 1/4× applied with flumioxazin at 1/4× PRE alone or fb imazapic at 1× ($1,114, $1,094, and $990/ha, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1343–1570 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In twin rows, diclosulam PRE at one-quarter rate gave the highest listed net return of $2,063/ha.

Treatment
diclosulam PRE alone at 1/4e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0
Value
$2,063e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The twin row-spacing regime net return was highest with diclosulam PRE alone at 1/4, 1/2, or 26 g/ha (1×) ($2,063, $1,846, $1,734/ha, respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1719 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The lowest herbicide tank mix input with high net return gave $1,162/ha.

Treatment
Diclosulam applied with flumioxazin at 1/2× fb imazapic at 1/2×e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
highe0
Value
$1,162/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Diclosulam applied with flumioxazin at 1/2× fb imazapic at 1/2× was the lowest herbicide tank-mix input providing high net return at $1,162/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1863 · show in text ↑
t0

“peanut”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 89–95 · show in text ↑

flumioxazin · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 15 positive, 3 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Diclosulam · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

imazapic · control · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 23 positive, 3 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.