Paper · 2019 · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)

Intensive plum orchard with summer training and pruning

Mika, A.; Buler, Z.

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An intensive plum orchard model was created for two types of fruit harvesting: by hand and with a self-propelled straddle harvester working in continuous motion. Six plum cultivars grafted on semi dwarfing rootstock ‘Prune Wangenheim’ (Prunus domestica) were planted at three densities (1000, 1250 and 1666 trees/ha). A new training system - central leader spindle - was applied. The leader was not headed after planting and summer training treatments were performed. From the third year onward renewal pruning was done after fruit harvesting. The new training and pruning system resulted in very rapid tree growth, much young wood, fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearing. Trees appeared to be suitable for hand and mechanical harvesting within four years from planting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The new training and pruning system caused rapid tree growth and much young wood.

Treatment
new training and pruning systeme0
Outcome
tree growth, much young woode0
Direction
very rapide0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The new training and pruning system resulted in very rapid tree growth, much young wood, fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The system promoted fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearing.

Treatment
new training and pruning systeme0
Outcome
fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearinge0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“The new training and pruning system resulted in very rapid tree growth, much young wood, fruit bud formation on young wood and early bearing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–684 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Trees were suitable for hand and mechanical harvesting within four years of planting.

Outcome
suitable for hand and mechanical harvestinge0
Qualifier
within four years from plantinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus domestica
Prunus domestica · TaxonYAMAMAYA · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“plum orchard”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–22 · show in text ↑
e0

“Trees appeared to be suitable for hand and mechanical harvesting within four years from planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–782 · show in text ↑

pruning · growth · Prunus domestica (plum)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 8 positive, 6 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.