Paper · 2003 · Weed Technology

Pronamide Applied to Sunflower Seeds for Orobanche cumana Control1

JORGE DÍAZ-SANCHEZ; MONTSERRAT JURADO-EXPÓSITO; FRANCISCA LÓPEZ-GRANADOS; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
18
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Field and laboratory studies were conducted from 1993 to 1997 to determine the feasibility of controlling nodding broomrape in sunflower by treating crop seeds with pronamide. Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solution or coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamide did not impair seed germination or seedling growth, and controlled nodding broomrape 49 to 68% and 51 to 77%, respectively, up to 105 d after planting. Studies of the effect of treated sunflower seeds on germination and seedling growth, at several time intervals after the herbicide application (0, 30, 60, and 90 d after treatment [DAT]), were conducted. Soaking with 50% solution or coating at 2 kg/ha reduced seedling growth by 20 and 24% 60 DAT, respectively, compared with the control.Nomenclature: Pronamide; nodding broomrape, Orobanche cumana Wallr. #3 ORACU; sunflower, Helianthus annuus L.Additional index words: Herbicide seed treatment, parasitic weed.Abbreviations: DAP, days after planting; DAT, days after treatment; HST, herbicide seed treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A five-minute 50% pronamide seed soak did not impair sunflower germination or seedling growth.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solutione0
Outcome
seed germination or seedling growthe0
Direction
did not impaire0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solution or coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamide did not impair seed germination or seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–341 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide coating at 2 kg/ha did not impair germination or seedling growth.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamidee0
Outcome
seed germination or seedling growthe0
Direction
did not impaire0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamide did not impair seed germination or seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 239–341 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% pronamide soak controlled nodding broomrape by 49 to 68% up to 105 days after planting.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solutione0
Interactor
nodding broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
nodding broomrapee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
49 to 68%e0
Qualifier
up to 105 d after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solution or coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamide did not impair seed germination or seedling growth, and controlled nodding broomrape 49 to 68% and 51 to 77%, respectively, up to 105 d after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide seed coating controlled nodding broomrape by 51 to 77% up to 105 days after planting.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuuse0
Treatment
coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamidee0
Interactor
nodding broomrapee0parasite
Outcome
nodding broomrapee0
Direction
controllede0
Value
51 to 77%e0
Qualifier
up to 105 d after plantinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking sunflower seeds for 5 min in 50% pronamide solution or coating at the equivalent of 2 kg/ha with pronamide did not impair seed germination or seedling growth, and controlled nodding broomrape 49 to 68% and 51 to 77%, respectively, up to 105 d after planting.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 176–442 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 50% pronamide soak reduced seedling growth by 20% at 60 days after treatment.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
Soaking with 50% solutione0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
20e0
Qualifier
60 DATe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking with 50% solution or coating at 2 kg/ha reduced seedling growth by 20 and 24% 60 DAT, respectively, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pronamide coating at 2 kg/ha reduced seedling growth by 24% at 60 days after treatment.

Taxon
sunflowerHelianthus annuust0
Treatment
coating at 2 kg/hae0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
24%e0
Qualifier
60 DATe0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Helianthus annuus
Helianthus annuus · TaxonJon Sullivan · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soaking with 50% solution or coating at 2 kg/ha reduced seedling growth by 20 and 24% 60 DAT, respectively, compared with the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 647–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Sunflower”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–30 · show in text ↑

storage · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 15 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

application · growth · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 73 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 73 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.