Paper · 1985 · Weed Research

Allelopathic effect of Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage) in wheat

J. R. QASEM; B. E. ABU‐IRMAILEH

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The allelopathic effect of Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage) was examined against wheat in glasshouse and laboratory experiments. The germination of wheat grains was delayed, and the development of wheat seedlings was decreased in laboratory experiments by both shoot and rhizome extract. The inhibitory effect of both extracts was most pronounced at 20°C compared with 10 or 15°C. Shoot extracts had more drastic effects than the rhizome extract on germination percentage, shoot and root lengths. In glasshouse experiments fresh and dried shoot of S. syriaca added to soil drastically decreased germination and development of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot extract delayed wheat grain germination.

Treatment
shoote0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
germination of wheat grainse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of wheat grains was delayed, and the development of wheat seedlings was decreased in laboratory experiments by both shoot and rhizome extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizome extract delayed wheat grain germination.

Treatment
rhizome extracte0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
germination of wheat grainse0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The germination of wheat grains was delayed, and the development of wheat seedlings was decreased in laboratory experiments by both shoot and rhizome extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 136–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot extract decreased wheat seedling development.

Treatment
shoote0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
development of wheat seedlingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development of wheat seedlings was decreased in laboratory experiments by both shoot and rhizome extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizome extract decreased wheat seedling development.

Treatment
rhizome extracte0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
development of wheat seedlingse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the development of wheat seedlings was decreased in laboratory experiments by both shoot and rhizome extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 185–294 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The extracts inhibited wheat most strongly at 20°C compared with 10 or 15°C.

Outcome
inhibitory effecte0
Direction
most pronouncede0
Value
20°Ce0
Comparator
10 or 15°Ce0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The inhibitory effect of both extracts was most pronounced at 20°C compared with 10 or 15°C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 295–387 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat in glasshouse and laboratory experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Shoot extract had stronger effects on wheat germination percentage and shoot and root lengths than rhizome extract.

Treatment
Shoot extractse0
Outcome
germination percentage, shoot and root lengthse0
Direction
more drastice0
Comparator
rhizome extracte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Shoot extracts had more drastic effects than the rhizome extract on germination percentage, shoot and root lengths.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 388–503 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat in glasshouse and laboratory experiments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 88–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fresh Salvia shoots added to soil decreased wheat germination and development.

Treatment
freshe0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
germination and development of wheate0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In glasshouse experiments fresh and dried shoot of S. syriaca added to soil drastically decreased germination and development of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dried Salvia shoots added to soil decreased wheat germination and development.

Treatment
dried shoote0
Interactor
Salvia syriaca L.Salvia syriacae1weed
Outcome
germination and development of wheate0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In glasshouse experiments fresh and dried shoot of S. syriaca added to soil drastically decreased germination and development of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 504–639 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salvia syriaca L. (Syrian sage)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 35–66 · show in text ↑

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

228 papers in the same direction as this paper · 206 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.