Paper · 2014 · Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems

Conservation agriculture in Southern Africa: Advances in knowledge

Christian Thierfelder; Leonard Rusinamhodzi; Amos R. Ngwira; et al.

8
claims
8
verbatim quotes
198
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

Abstract The increasing demand for food from limited available land, in light of declining soil fertility and future threats of climate variability and change have increased the need for more sustainable crop management systems. Conservation agriculture (CA) is based on the three principles of minimum soil disturbance, surface crop residue retention and crop rotations, and is one of the available options. In Southern Africa, CA has been intensively promoted for more than a decade to combat declining soil fertility and to stabilize crop yields. The objective of this review is to summarize recent advances in knowledge about the benefits of CA and highlight constraints to its widespread adoption within Southern Africa. Research results from Southern Africa showed that CA generally increased water infiltration, reduced soil erosion and run-off, thereby increasing available soil moisture and deeper drainage. Physical, chemical and biological soil parameters were also improved under CA in the medium to long term. CA increased crop productivity and also reduced on-farm labor, especially when direct seeding techniques and herbicides were used. As with other cropping systems, CA has constraints at both the field and farm level. Challenges to adoption in Southern Africa include the retention of sufficient crop residues, crop rotations, weed control, pest and diseases, farmer perception and economic limitations, including poorly developed markets. It was concluded that CA is not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution and often needs significant adaptation and flexibility when implementing it across farming systems. However, CA may potentially reduce future soil fertility decline, the effects of seasonal dry-spells and may have a large impact on food security and farmers’ livelihoods if the challenges can be overcome.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture generally increased water infiltration.

Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
water infiltratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CA generally increased water infiltration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–817 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture reduced soil erosion and runoff.

Outcome
soil erosion and run-offe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“reduced soil erosion and run-off”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 819–851 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture increased available soil moisture and deeper drainage.

Outcome
available soil moisture and deeper drainagee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“thereby increasing available soil moisture and deeper drainage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 853–915 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture improved physical, chemical and biological soil parameters in the medium to long term.

Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
Physical, chemical and biological soil parameterse0
Direction
improvede0
Qualifier
medium to long terme0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Physical, chemical and biological soil parameters were also improved under CA in the medium to long term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1021 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture increased crop productivity.

Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
crop productivitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CA increased crop productivity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedreview summarypositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture reduced on-farm labor, especially with direct seeding and herbicides.

Treatment
CAe0
Outcome
on-farm labore0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
especially when direct seeding techniques and herbicides were usede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“CA increased crop productivity and also reduced on-farm labor, especially when direct seeding techniques and herbicides were used”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1152 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend adapting conservation agriculture flexibly across farming systems.

Outcome
significant adaptation and flexibility when implementing it across farming systemse0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“CA is not a ‘one-size-fits-all’ solution and often needs significant adaptation and flexibility when implementing it across farming systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1483–1622 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Conservation agriculture may reduce future soil fertility decline and seasonal dry-spell effects if adoption challenges are overcome.

Outcome
reduce future soil fertility decline, the effects of seasonal dry-spellse0
Qualifier
if the challenges can be overcomee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“CA may potentially reduce future soil fertility decline, the effects of seasonal dry-spells and may have a large impact on food security and farmers’ livelihoods if the challenges can be overcome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1828 · show in text ↑