Paper · 2005 · Proceedings of the New Zealand Weed Control Conference

Soil biota associated with endophyteinfected tall fescue in the field

A.J. Popay; J.G. Jensen

4
claims
9
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Invertebrates present in soil samples taken from plots of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophyte (AR501 and AR542) at Aorangi near Palmerston North and one strain (AR501) at Lincoln in Canterbury together with endophytefree controls at both sites were determined in autumn 2002 Roots taken from these samples were stained and checked for the presence of arbuscular mycorrhiza At Lincoln numbers of root aphid (Aploneura lentisci) associated with plants infected with AR501 were significantly less than those on endophytefree plants while grass grub numbers (Costelytra zealandica) did not differ between treatments Beneficial invertebrates Collembola mites and earthworms were not affected by endophyte at either site and neither was colonisation of roots by mycorrhiza

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root aphids were significantly less numerous on AR501 infected tall fescue at Lincoln than on endophyte-free plants.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
infected with AR501e0
Interactor
Aploneura lentisciAploneura lentiscie0pest
Second interactor
Neotyphodium endophytee1symbiont
Outcome
numbers of root aphid (Aploneura lentisci)e0
Direction
lesse0
Comparator
endophytefree plantse0
Setting
Lincolne0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Aploneura lentisci
Aploneura lentisci · InteractorRyan Hodnett · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At Lincoln numbers of root aphid (Aploneura lentisci) associated with plants infected with AR501 were significantly less than those on endophytefree plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–587 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophyte (AR501 and AR542) at Aorangi near Palmerston North and one strain (AR501) at Lincoln in Canterbury”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–251 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grass grub numbers did not differ with endophyte infection.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophytee1
Interactor
Costelytra zealandicaCostelytra zealandicae0pest
Second interactor
Neotyphodium endophytee1symbiont
Outcome
grass grub numbers (Costelytra zealandica)e0
Direction
did not differe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Costelytra zealandica
Costelytra zealandica · InteractorSiobhan Leachman · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grass grub numbers (Costelytra zealandica) did not differ between treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 594–670 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophyte (AR501 and AR542)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Collembola, mites and earthworms were unaffected by endophyte infection at either site.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume1
Treatment
endophytee0
Interactor
Neotyphodium endophytee1symbiont
Outcome
Collembola mites and earthwormse0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Beneficial invertebrates Collembola mites and earthworms were not affected by endophyte at either site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–773 · show in text ↑
e1

“plots of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophyte (AR501 and AR542)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Endophyte infection did not affect mycorrhizal root colonization.

Taxon
tall fescueLolium arundinaceume2
Treatment
endophytee1
Interactor
mycorrhizae0symbiont
Second interactor
Neotyphodium endophytee2symbiont
Outcome
colonisation of roots by mycorrhizae0
Direction
not affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium arundinaceum
Lolium arundinaceum · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek, Kenraiz · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“neither was colonisation of roots by mycorrhiza”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–825 · show in text ↑
e1

“Beneficial invertebrates Collembola mites and earthworms were not affected by endophyte at either site”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–773 · show in text ↑
e2

“plots of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) infected with two nontoxic strains of Neotyphodium endophyte (AR501 and AR542)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 49–170 · show in text ↑

inoculation · soil: biology · Lolium arundinaceum (tall fescue)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.