Paper · 2013 · Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Research

Interaction of herbicides and bio-inoculants with agricultural crops and weeds.

Shahida Khalid; Shahida Nasreen Khokhar

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Bioinoculants contribute to soil environment through their versatile role. Whereas weeds are a limitation and herbicide carryover can also be injurious to subsequent crops. The residual/carryover herbicides may influence sowing decisions for the next crop due to reduced herbicide breakdown. The present study aimed at exploring the contribution of bio-fertilizer microbes (Azospirillum) to mitigate the inhibitory effect of herbicide residue in soil, and their inhibitory effect on weed seeds. The crops studied under laboratory conditions were Brassica spp. and Zea mays while Phalaris minor was the test weed. In first experiment, Brassica and maize, grown in soils having residues of either Triasulfuron+Terbutryn (Logran) or Sulfosulfuron (Leader), were found to significantly mitigate (% increase in root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight) the inhibitory effect of residues , when inoculated with Azospirillum A4. In second experiment two Azospirillum (B2 and B3) and two Azorhizobium (3.6ksk and srsn2k4) isolates reduced seed germination of Phalaris minor by 95%. The results imply that biofertilizer microbes can mitigate the carryover effect of the two sulfonylureas; they can also inhibit Phalaris minor. Therefore, the use of bio-inoculants, weed seed germination and residual effect of weedicide can be manipulated for the betterment of the crops and these microbes can be used for a positive interaction of maintaining a threshold of weeds in a crop field.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum A4 inoculation significantly mitigated the inhibitory effect of herbicide residues on Brassica growth.

Taxon
BrassicaBrassicae1
Treatment
inoculated with Azospirillum A4e1
Interactor
Azospirillum A4e1symbiont
Outcome
root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
mitigatee1
Qualifier
soils having residues of either Triasulfuron+Terbutryn (Logran) or Sulfosulfuron (Leader)e1
Setting
laboratory conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica
Brassica · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)TeunSpaans · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The crops studied under laboratory conditions were Brassica spp. and Zea mays while Phalaris minor was the test weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica and maize, grown in soils having residues of either Triasulfuron+Terbutryn (Logran) or Sulfosulfuron (Leader), were found to significantly mitigate (% increase in root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight) the inhibitory effect of residues , when inoculated with Azospirillum A4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Azospirillum A4 inoculation significantly mitigated the inhibitory effect of herbicide residues on maize growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
inoculated with Azospirillum A4e1
Interactor
Azospirillum A4e1symbiont
Outcome
root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weighte1
Direction
mitigatee1
Qualifier
soils having residues of either Triasulfuron+Terbutryn (Logran) or Sulfosulfuron (Leader)e1
Setting
laboratory conditionse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The crops studied under laboratory conditions were Brassica spp. and Zea mays while Phalaris minor was the test weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
e1

“Brassica and maize, grown in soils having residues of either Triasulfuron+Terbutryn (Logran) or Sulfosulfuron (Leader), were found to significantly mitigate (% increase in root length, shoot length, fresh weight and dry weight) the inhibitory effect of residues , when inoculated with Azospirillum A4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 634–934 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two Azospirillum and two Azorhizobium isolates reduced seed germination of Phalaris minor by 95%.

Taxon
Phalaris minorPhalaris minore3
Treatment
two Azospirillum (B2 and B3) and two Azorhizobium (3.6ksk and srsn2k4) isolatese3
Interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume3biocontrol_agent
Second interactor
AzorhizobiumAzorhizobiume3biocontrol_agent
Outcome
seed germinatione3
Direction
reducede3
Value
95%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phalaris minor
Phalaris minor · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryMatt Lavin from Bozeman, Montana, USA · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · InteractorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azorhizobium
Azorhizobium · Second interactorTony Rebelo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e2

“The crops studied under laboratory conditions were Brassica spp. and Zea mays while Phalaris minor was the test weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–611 · show in text ↑
e3

“In second experiment two Azospirillum (B2 and B3) and two Azorhizobium (3.6ksk and srsn2k4) isolates reduced seed germination of Phalaris minor by 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1086 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

28 papers: 28 positive, 0 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · growth · BrassicaPositive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

inoculation · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

699 papers: 635 positive, 64 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 61 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

695 papers more in this group

See all 699 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.