Paper · 2012 · FEMS Yeast Research

Evaluation of yeasts obtained from Antarctic soil samples as biocontrol agents for the management of postharvest diseases of apple (Malus × domestica)

Silvana Vero; Gabriela Garmendia; M. Belén González; et al.

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
126
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Psychrotrophic yeasts were isolated from Antarctic soils, selected based on their ability to grow in apple juice at low temperatures, and were evaluated as potential biocontrol agents for the management of postharvest diseases of apple during cold storage. Among the species recovered, an isolate of Leucosporidium scottii, designated At17, was identified as a good biocontrol agent for blue and gray mold of two apple cultivars. The selected isolate produced soluble and volatile antifungal substances that were inhibitory to apple pathogens. Siderophore production was also demonstrated, but it did not appear to play a role in pathogen inhibition. The selected yeast had the capacity to form a biofilm when grown in apple juice, which is considered an important attribute of postharvest antagonists to successfully colonize wounds and intact fruit surfaces. At17 was resistant to commonly used postharvest fungicides, so application of a combination of low-dose fungicide along with the biocontrol agent could be used as an integrated management practice.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leucosporidium scottii At17 controlled blue and gray mold of two apple cultivars.

Material
two apple cultivarse0
Interactor
Leucosporidium scottiiLeucosporidium scottiie0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
blue and gray molde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“an isolate of Leucosporidium scottii, designated At17, was identified as a good biocontrol agent for blue and gray mold of two apple cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 286–428 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At17 produced soluble antifungal substances inhibitory to apple pathogens.

Interactor
apple pathogense0pathogen
Outcome
soluble and volatile antifungal substancese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“The selected isolate produced soluble and volatile antifungal substances that were inhibitory to apple pathogens”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–542 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Siderophore production did not appear to contribute to pathogen inhibition.

Outcome
pathogen inhibitione0
Qualifier
Siderophore productione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“Siderophore production was also demonstrated, but it did not appear to play a role in pathogen inhibition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 544–649 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At17 formed a biofilm in apple juice.

Outcome
form a biofilme0
Setting
apple juicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“The selected yeast had the capacity to form a biofilm when grown in apple juice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–730 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At17 was resistant to commonly used postharvest fungicides.

Outcome
resistant to commonly used postharvest fungicidese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“At17 was resistant to commonly used postharvest fungicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–919 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest combining low-dose fungicide with the biocontrol agent.

Outcome
application of a combination of low-dose fungicide along with the biocontrol agente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“apple (Malus × domestica)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 125–150 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of a combination of low-dose fungicide along with the biocontrol agent could be used as an integrated management practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–1057 · show in text ↑