Abstract
Abstract Field trials were conducted during 2002 and 2003 to determine the productivity and compatibility of the cropping systems obtained from intercropping varieties of sesame (E8, PBTil and 530‐6‐1) and sunflower (Funtua, Record and Isaanka) in the humid forest–savanna transition zone which is outside the current growing areas. Intercropping did not affect the number of branches per plant, number and weight of capsules per plant, weight of seeds per plant, 1000 seed weight or seed production efficiency (SPE) of all sesame varieties in both years, except SPE in 2003. In both years, intercropping sesame with sunflower varieties significantly reduced grain yield of PBTil and E8. However, 530‐6‐1 produced grain yield similar to the monocrop when intercropped with Record and Funtua in 2002 and 2003, and Record in 2003. In both years, intercropping significantly depressed the grain yield of the three sunflower varieties because of reduction in their head diameter, head weight, number and weight of seeds per head and lower number of plants per unit area relative to their monocrops. E8, 530‐6‐1 and PBTil intercropped with the three sunflower varieties recorded land equivalent ratio values in the range of 1.13–1.37, 1.32–1.46 and 1.22–1.35, respectively. Based on competitive ratio values, E8 demonstrated the greatest ability to compensate for intercrop competition with taller sunflower varieties. It was concluded that growers can successfully cultivate sesame (530‐6‐1 and PBTil) under intercropping with sunflower in the humid forest–savanna transition zone.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping generally did not change sesame branch number, capsule traits, seed weight or seed production efficiency, apart from 2003 efficiency.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- number of branches per plant, number and weight of capsules per plante0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Qualifier
- except SPE in 2003e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Intercropping did not affect the number of branches per plant, number and weight of capsules per plant, weight of seeds per plant, 1000 seed weight or seed production efficiency (SPE) of all sesame varieties in both years, except SPE in 2003.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping generally did not change sesame seed weight and seed production efficiency, apart from 2003 efficiency.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Treatment
- Intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- weight of seeds per plant, 1000 seed weight or seed production efficiency (SPE)e0
- Direction
- did not affecte0
- Qualifier
- except SPE in 2003e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Intercropping did not affect the number of branches per plant, number and weight of capsules per plant, weight of seeds per plant, 1000 seed weight or seed production efficiency (SPE) of all sesame varieties in both years, except SPE in 2003.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping significantly reduced grain yield of PBTil sesame in both years.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- PBTile0
- Treatment
- intercropping sesame with sunflower varietiese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In both years, intercropping sesame with sunflower varieties significantly reduced grain yield of PBTil and E8.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping significantly reduced grain yield of E8 sesame in both years.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- E8e0
- Treatment
- intercropping sesame with sunflower varietiese0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- reducede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“In both years, intercropping sesame with sunflower varieties significantly reduced grain yield of PBTil and E8.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Sesame 530‐6‐1 yielded similarly to monocrop with Record and Funtua intercropping.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- 530‐6‐1e0
- Treatment
- intercropped with Record and Funtuae0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- similar toe0
- Comparator
- monocrope0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“530‐6‐1 produced grain yield similar to the monocrop when intercropped with Record and Funtua in 2002 and 2003, and Record in 2003.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping depressed grain yield of sunflower varieties relative to monocrops.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuust0 - Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- depressede0
- Comparator
- their monocropse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“intercropping significantly depressed the grain yield of the three sunflower varieties because of reduction in their head diameter, head weight, number and weight of seeds per head and lower number of plants per unit area relative to their monocrops.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower head diameter and head weight declined under intercropping.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuust0 - Outcome
- head diameter, head weighte0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- their monocropse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“reduction in their head diameter, head weight, number and weight of seeds per head and lower number of plants per unit area relative to their monocrops.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower seed number and weight per head declined under intercropping.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuust0 - Outcome
- number and weight of seeds per heade0
- Direction
- reductione0
- Comparator
- their monocropse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“reduction in their head diameter, head weight, number and weight of seeds per head and lower number of plants per unit area relative to their monocrops.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
Sunflower plant density was lower under intercropping than monocropping.
- Taxon
- sunflower
Helianthus annuust0 - Outcome
- number of plants per unit areae0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- their monocropse0
Not reportedTreatment
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“lower number of plants per unit area relative to their monocrops.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
E8 intercropping had land equivalent ratios of 1.13–1.37.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- E8e0
- Treatment
- intercropped with the three sunflower varietiese0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio valuese0
- Value
- 1.13–1.37e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“E8, 530‐6‐1 and PBTil intercropped with the three sunflower varieties recorded land equivalent ratio values in the range of 1.13–1.37, 1.32–1.46 and 1.22–1.35, respectively.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
530‐6‐1 intercropping had land equivalent ratios of 1.32–1.46.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- 530‐6‐1e0
- Treatment
- intercropped with the three sunflower varietiese0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio valuese0
- Value
- 1.32–1.46e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“E8, 530‐6‐1 and PBTil intercropped with the three sunflower varieties recorded land equivalent ratio values in the range of 1.13–1.37, 1.32–1.46 and 1.22–1.35, respectively.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
PBTil intercropping had land equivalent ratios of 1.22–1.35.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- PBTile0
- Treatment
- intercropped with the three sunflower varietiese0
- Outcome
- land equivalent ratio valuese0
- Value
- 1.22–1.35e0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“E8, 530‐6‐1 and PBTil intercropped with the three sunflower varieties recorded land equivalent ratio values in the range of 1.13–1.37, 1.32–1.46 and 1.22–1.35, respectively.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
E8 had the greatest capacity to compensate for competition with taller sunflower varieties.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Material
- E8e0
- Interactor
- sunflower
Helianthus annuuse0other - Outcome
- greatest ability to compensate for intercrop competitione0
- Direction
- greateste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.


Verbatim
e0“E8 demonstrated the greatest ability to compensate for intercrop competition with taller sunflower varieties.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend cultivating 530‐6‐1 and PBTil sesame with sunflower in the humid forest–savanna transition zone.
- Taxon
- sesame
Sesamum indicumt0 - Outcome
- cultivate sesame (530‐6‐1 and PBTil) under intercropping with sunflowere0
- Setting
- humid forest–savanna transition zonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“growers can successfully cultivate sesame (530‐6‐1 and PBTil) under intercropping with sunflower in the humid forest–savanna transition zone.”
t0“sesame and sunflower varieties”
The same questions in other papers
intercropping · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →intercropping · yield · Helianthus annuus (common sunflower)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.