Paper · 2005

AGRONOMIC TRAITS OF SESAME AS AFFECTED BY GRAIN LEGUMES INTERCROPPING AND PLANTING PATTERNS

I. H. Bhatti; Riaz Ahmad; M. S. Nazir

6
claims
6
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted on a sandy-clay loam soil at the agronomic area, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad for two consecutive years to evaluate the effect of grain legumes intercropping and the planting patterns on the agronomic traits of sesame. The planting patterns comprised 40 cm spaced single rows, 60 cm spaced 2-row strips and 100 cm spaced 4-row strips while the intercropping systems were sesame + mungbean, sesame + mashbean, sesame + soybean and sesame + cowpea and sesame alone. The various yield components of sesame such as number of capsules plant, seed weight plant, 1OOO-seed weight and plant height were affected significantly by different intercropping systems and planting patterns. Grain legumes intercropping reduced the seed yield of sesame to a significant level by adversely affecting its yield components. However, the additional harvest of each intercrop compensated more than the loss in sesame production. Among the intercropping patterns sesame intercropped with mungbean, mashbean, soybean and cowpea in the pattern of 100 cm spaced 4-row strips proved to be feasible, easily workable and more productive than sesame monocropping. Of the intercropping systems, sesame + mungbean or sesame + mash bean were found to be superior

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping systems and planting patterns significantly affected sesame yield components.

Treatment
different intercropping systems and planting patternse0
Outcome
number of capsules plant, seed weight plant, 1OOO-seed weight and plant heighte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The various yield components of sesame such as number of capsules plant, seed weight plant, 1OOO-seed weight and plant height were affected significantly by different intercropping systems and planting patterns.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 506–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain legume intercropping significantly reduced sesame seed yield.

Treatment
Grain legumes intercroppinge0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain legumes intercropping reduced the seed yield of sesame to a significant level by adversely affecting its yield components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–846 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The additional intercrop harvest more than compensated for lost sesame production.

Outcome
additional harvest of each intercrope0
Direction
compensated more thane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the additional harvest of each intercrop compensated more than the loss in sesame production.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–949 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four legume intercrops in 100 cm four-row strips were more productive than sesame monocropping.

Treatment
100 cm spaced 4-row stripse0
Outcome
more productivee0
Direction
more productivee0
Comparator
sesame monocroppinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame intercropped with mungbean, mashbean, soybean and cowpea in the pattern of 100 cm spaced 4-row strips proved to be feasible, easily workable and more productive than sesame monocropping.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1176 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame with mungbean was among the superior intercropping systems.

Treatment
sesame + mungbeane0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame + mungbean or sesame + mash bean were found to be superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1272 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sesame with mash bean was among the superior intercropping systems.

Treatment
sesame + mash beane0
Outcome
superiore0
Direction
superiore0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sesamum indicum
Sesamum indicum · TaxonFranz Xaver · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sesame + mungbean or sesame + mash bean were found to be superior”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1272 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Sesamum indicum (sesame)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 21 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.