Paper · 2012 · Electronic Journal of Polish Agricultural Universities. Series Agronomy

APPLICATION OF COMPLEX FERTILIZERS IN OATS

Anna Nogalska; J. Czapla; Andrzej Klasa

6
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the paper effects of two complex blended fertilizers on yield and content, as well as accumulation of macronutrients by oats are presented. From the results of three-years lasting field trial it can be concluded that application of complex blended fertilizers (under commercial names Amofosmag 4 and Amofosmag 3) did not affect oats grain and straw yields in comparison to control (straight NPK fertilizers). Content of studied macronutrients in grain appeared to be unaffected by fertilization treatments. However, significant differences of chemical composition of oats tissues were noted between seasons of studies what indicated impact of weather conditions. The highest total uptake of nitrogen and potassium by oats yield was found in Amofosmag 3 treatment whereas total uptake of phosphorus was the highest in control treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blended fertilizers did not affect oats grain and straw yields relative to straight NPK.

Treatment
complex blended fertilizerse0
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0
Comparator
straight NPK fertilizerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of complex blended fertilizers (under commercial names Amofosmag 4 and Amofosmag 3) did not affect oats grain and straw yields in comparison to control (straight NPK fertilizers)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain macronutrient content was unaffected by fertilization.

Treatment
fertilization treatmentse0
Outcome
Content of studied macronutrients in graine0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“OATS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“Content of studied macronutrients in grain appeared to be unaffected by fertilization treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–508 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Oats tissue chemical composition differed significantly between seasons.

Outcome
chemical composition of oats tissuese0
Setting
seasons of studiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant differences of chemical composition of oats tissues were noted between seasons of studies what indicated impact of weather conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 519–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen uptake by oats yield was highest with Amofosmag 3.

Treatment
Amofosmag 3 treatmente0
Outcome
total uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total uptake of nitrogen and potassium by oats yield was found in Amofosmag 3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium uptake by oats yield was highest with Amofosmag 3.

Treatment
Amofosmag 3 treatmente0
Outcome
potassium by oats yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest total uptake of nitrogen and potassium by oats yield was found in Amofosmag 3 treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphorus uptake was highest in the control treatment.

Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
total uptake of phosphoruse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena sativa
Avena sativa · TaxonSendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“OATS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–42 · show in text ↑
e0

“total uptake of phosphorus was the highest in control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 774–837 · show in text ↑

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 143 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 143 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.