Paper · 1996 · Acta Botanica Neerlandica

Effects of soil P status on growth and P and N uptake ofCarexspecies from fens differing in P-availability

M. ESTHER PÉREZ-CORONA; JOS T. A. VERHOEVEN

12
claims
19
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

We studied the effects of different soil P status (P-deficient, P-poor and P-rich fen soils) on growth, root allocation and P and N-uptake of Carex species from fens differing in P-availability. We carried out a 3-month pot experiment where the three species were grown in each soil. Carex acutiformis, a species from eutrophic fens, showed the highest production under all soil conditions and changes in biomass allocation to belowground parts, but not in specific root length (SRL) or root length/leaf area ratio (RLLA) in response to changes in the P-soil status. Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh., a species from P-limited areas, showed intermediate biomass production and low inherent root weight ratio (RWR). Carex diandra Schrank., a species from areas where the growth of the vegetation is limited by nitrogen, showed low biomass production in all three fen soils studied, and no changes in its high specific root length (SRL) or root weight ratio (RWR) with soil phosphorus status. All three Carex species showed the best growth under P-poor conditions and a very reduced growth on the P-limited soil. Phosphorus uptake by Carex species was affected by P-soil status being lowest under P-deficient conditions for all three Carex species. P-soil status also affected N-uptake which was lower under P-deficient conditions than in the other two soils. It can be concluded that the success of both small Carex species in nutrient poor sites cannot be explained by higher relative growth rate, biomass production or nutrient uptake than the species from eutrophic areas. Other factors (water and soil chemistry other than N and P richness, presence of a bryophyte layer, establishment of seedlings, clonal reproduction, competition ability) must play a role in determining the distinct distribution pattern of these species.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex acutiformis had the highest production in all soils.

Taxon
Carex acutiformisCarex acutiformise0
Outcome
productione0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex acutiformis
Carex acutiformis · TaxonThis photography was created by Artem Topchiy (user Art-top ). Other photos see here This photograph was taken with a Canon PowerShot S2 IS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carex acutiformis, a species from eutrophic fens, showed the highest production under all soil conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–389 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex acutiformis changed belowground biomass allocation with soil P status.

Taxon
Carex acutiformisCarex acutiformise2
Outcome
biomass allocation to belowground partse0
Setting
P-soil statuse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex acutiformis
Carex acutiformis · TaxonThis photography was created by Artem Topchiy (user Art-top ). Other photos see here This photograph was taken with a Canon PowerShot S2 IS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in biomass allocation to belowground parts, but not in specific root length (SRL) or root length/leaf area ratio (RLLA) in response to changes in the P-soil status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 394–565 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carex acutiformis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–301 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex acutiformis specific root length and root length to leaf area ratio did not change with P status.

Taxon
Carex acutiformisCarex acutiformise2
Outcome
specific root length (SRL) or root length/leaf area ratio (RLLA)e0
Direction
note0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex acutiformis
Carex acutiformis · TaxonThis photography was created by Artem Topchiy (user Art-top ). Other photos see here This photograph was taken with a Canon PowerShot S2 IS · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but not in specific root length (SRL) or root length/leaf area ratio (RLLA) in response to changes in the P-soil status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 446–565 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carex acutiformis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–301 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex lasiocarpa had intermediate biomass production.

Taxon
Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh.Carex lasiocarpae0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
intermediatee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex lasiocarpa
Carex lasiocarpa · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh., a species from P-limited areas, showed intermediate biomass production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–661 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex lasiocarpa had low inherent root weight ratio.

Taxon
Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh.Carex lasiocarpae2
Outcome
root weight ratio (RWR)e0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex lasiocarpa
Carex lasiocarpa · TaxonKrzysztof Ziarnek · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“low inherent root weight ratio (RWR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–702 · show in text ↑
e2

“Carex lasiocarpa Ehrh.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–589 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex diandra had low biomass production in all three fen soils.

Taxon
Carex diandra Schrank.Carex diandrae0
Outcome
biomass productione0
Direction
lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex diandra
Carex diandra · TaxonRobert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS, 1992, Western wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute (WSI), Sacra · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Carex diandra Schrank., a species from areas where the growth of the vegetation is limited by nitrogen, showed low biomass production in all three fen soils studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–868 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex diandra specific root length and root weight ratio did not change with P status.

Taxon
Carex diandra Schrank.Carex diandrae1
Outcome
specific root length (SRL) or root weight ratio (RWR)e0
Direction
no changese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex diandra
Carex diandra · TaxonRobert H. Mohlenbrock. USDA NRCS, 1992, Western wetland flora: Field office guide to plant species. Provided by USDA NRCS Wetland Science Institute (WSI), Sacra · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“no changes in its high specific root length (SRL) or root weight ratio (RWR) with soil phosphorus status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“Carex diandra Schrank.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three Carex species grew best under P-poor conditions.

Taxon
Carex speciesCarexe0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
beste0
Setting
P-poor conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All three Carex species showed the best growth under P-poor conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1050 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All three Carex species had very reduced growth on P-limited soil.

Taxon
Carex speciesCarext0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reducede0
Setting
P-limited soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a very reduced growth on the P-limited soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1055–1098 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of soil P status on growth and P and N uptake ofCarexspecies from fens differing in P-availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex phosphorus uptake was lowest under P-deficient conditions.

Taxon
Carex speciesCarexe0
Outcome
Phosphorus uptakee0
Direction
loweste0
Setting
P-deficient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Phosphorus uptake by Carex species was affected by P-soil status being lowest under P-deficient conditions for all three Carex species.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1100–1235 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carex nitrogen uptake was lower in P-deficient soil than the other two soils.

Taxon
Carex speciesCarext0
Outcome
N-uptakee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
the other two soilse0
Setting
P-deficient conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N-uptake which was lower under P-deficient conditions than in the other two soils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1345 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of soil P status on growth and P and N uptake ofCarexspecies from fens differing in P-availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that the small Carex species success in nutrient poor sites is not explained by superior growth or nutrient uptake.

Taxon
Carex speciesCarext0
Outcome
success of both small Carex species in nutrient poor sitese0
Qualifier
cannot be explained by higher relative growth rate, biomass production or nutrient uptakee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Carex
Carex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Christian Fischer · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the success of both small Carex species in nutrient poor sites cannot be explained by higher relative growth rate, biomass production or nutrient uptake than the species from eutrophic areas”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1372–1562 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effects of soil P status on growth and P and N uptake ofCarexspecies from fens differing in P-availability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–106 · show in text ↑