Paper · 1972 · Weed Research

SELECTIVE ACTION OF TRIAZINES FOR CONTROL OF WILD CANARYGRASS IN WHEAT

Y. ESHEL

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
5
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary. The selective action of triazine herbicides for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat was studied in four field experiments. Canarygrass was controlled by pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne. The phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheat was higher than that of terbutryne. Addition of small amounts of simazine to either one of the methylthiotriazines considerably increased damage to wheat. The most resistant stage of wheat after emergence was that of spike initiation, whereas the most sensitive stage was that of earing. Increase of yield as a result of control of canarygrass was higher in semi‐dwarf wheat than in normal‐height cultivars. Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively. Action selective des triazines pour la lutte contre les Phalaris dans le blé

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wild canarygrass was controlled in wheat by pre- and post-emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne.

Treatment
pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutrynee0
Interactor
wild canarygrasse7weed
Outcome
Canarygrasse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Canarygrass was controlled by pre‐ and post‐emergence applications of methoprotryne and terbutryne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 150–248 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methoprotryne was more phytotoxic to wheat than terbutryne.

Treatment
methoprotrynee1
Outcome
phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheate1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
terbutrynee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The phytotoxicity of methoprotryne to wheat was higher than that of terbutryne”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 250–328 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding small amounts of simazine to either methylthiotriazine considerably increased damage to wheat.

Treatment
Addition of small amounts of simazinee2
Outcome
damage to wheate2
Direction
increasede2
Comparator
either one of the methylthiotriazinese2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“Addition of small amounts of simazine to either one of the methylthiotriazines considerably increased damage to wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–447 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat was most resistant to the triazines after emergence at the spike initiation stage.

Organ / stage
spike initiatione3
Outcome
stage of wheat after emergencee3
Direction
most resistante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The most resistant stage of wheat after emergence was that of spike initiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 449–527 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat was most sensitive to the triazines after emergence at the earing stage.

Organ / stage
earinge4
Outcome
most sensitive stagee4
Direction
most sensitivee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“whereas the most sensitive stage was that of earing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 529–580 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield increase from canarygrass control was higher in semi-dwarf wheat than in normal-height cultivars.

Material
semi‐dwarf wheate5
Treatment
control of canarygrasse5
Outcome
Increase of yielde5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
normal‐height cultivarse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“Increase of yield as a result of control of canarygrass was higher in semi‐dwarf wheat than in normal‐height cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 582–700 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 625 g/ha terbutryne pre- and post-emergence increased grain yield of a semi-dwarf wheat cultivar by 56%.

Material
semi‐dwarf cultivare6
Treatment
Application of 625 g/ha of terbutrynee6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
56%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–839 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 625 g/ha terbutryne post-emergence increased grain yield of a semi-dwarf wheat cultivar by 29%.

Material
semi‐dwarf cultivare6
Treatment
Application of 625 g/ha of terbutrynee6
Outcome
grain yielde6
Direction
increasede6
Value
29%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Application of 625 g/ha of terbutryne to a semi‐dwarf cultivar pre‐ and post‐emergence increased grain yield by 56% and 29%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–839 · show in text ↑
e7

“for control of wild canarygrass ( Phalaris spp.) in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 53–110 · show in text ↑

terbutryn · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

herbicide · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 21 positive, 10 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.