Paper · 1980 · Tropical Pest Management

Selective Action of Post-emergence Herbicides onPhalaris minorandAvenaspp. in Wheat in Northern India

O. P. Kataria; Vijay Kumar

9
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The selective action of MSMA, benzoylprop-ethyl, nitrofen, dichlormate, terbutryne and methabenzthiazuron and their combinations with 2, 4-D for control of grass weeds in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) was studied in two field experiments at Haryana Agricultural University, Hissar, India, during 1975–76 and 1976–77. The differences in response among wheat, wild canarygrass, wild oats and broadleaved weeds to post-emergence herbicides were very variable. Methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 and 2.0 kg/ha and terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/ha sprayed in the wheat crop at maximum tillering stage killed more than 70% of wild canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) and wild oats (Avena spp.) with no injury to the crop plants, resulting in the highest grain yield. The application of 2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha) controlled only 55% wild canarygrass and 40% wild oats but significantly increased the wheat yields over the unweeded control. The other post-emergence herbicides were not effective in controlling both weeds selectively. 2, 4-D in combination with various herbicides was phytotoxic to the crop.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat and weed responses to post-emergence herbicides were variable.

Treatment
post-emergence herbicidese0
Outcome
differences in responsee0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The differences in response among wheat, wild canarygrass, wild oats and broadleaved weeds to post-emergence herbicides were very variable.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 332–471 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methabenzthiazuron killed more than 70% of wild canarygrass.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 and 2.0 kg/hae0
Interactor
Phalaris spp.Phalarise0weed
Outcome
wild canarygrasse0
Direction
killede0
Value
more than 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phalaris
Phalaris · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 and 2.0 kg/ha and terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/ha sprayed in the wheat crop at maximum tillering stage killed more than 70% of wild canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) and wild oats (Avena spp.) with no injury to the crop plants, resulting in the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Terbutryne killed more than 70% of wild oats.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/hae0
Interactor
Avena spp.Avenae0weed
Outcome
wild oatse0
Direction
killede0
Value
more than 70%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/ha sprayed in the wheat crop at maximum tillering stage killed more than 70% of wild canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) and wild oats (Avena spp.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 517–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These herbicides caused no wheat injury and gave the highest grain yield.

Taxon
wheat cropTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 and 2.0 kg/ha and terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/hae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Methabenzthiazuron at 1.75 and 2.0 kg/ha and terbutryne at 0.60 to 0.75 kg/ha sprayed in the wheat crop at maximum tillering stage killed more than 70% of wild canarygrass (Phalaris spp.) and wild oats (Avena spp.) with no injury to the crop plants, resulting in the highest grain yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 472–759 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D controlled 55% of wild canarygrass.

Treatment
2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
wild canarygrasse0weed
Outcome
wild canarygrasse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
55%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha) controlled only 55% wild canarygrass and 40% wild oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D controlled 40% of wild oats.

Treatment
2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha)e0
Interactor
wild oatsAvenae0weed
Outcome
wild oatse0
Direction
controllede0
Value
40%e0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Avena
Avena · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Sendelbach ( talk ) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of 2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha) controlled only 55% wild canarygrass and 40% wild oats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–853 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D significantly increased wheat yields over the unweeded control.

Treatment
2, 4-De1
Outcome
wheat yieldse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
unweeded controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly increased the wheat yields over the unweeded control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 858–924 · show in text ↑
e1

“The application of 2, 4-D (0.50 kg/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 760–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Other post-emergence herbicides did not selectively control both weeds.

Treatment
other post-emergence herbicidese0
Outcome
controlling both weeds selectivelye0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The other post-emergence herbicides were not effective in controlling both weeds selectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 926–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

2, 4-D combined with various herbicides was phytotoxic to wheat.

Treatment
2, 4-D in combination with various herbicidese0
Outcome
phytotoxic to the crope0

Not reportedTaxonComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D in combination with various herbicides was phytotoxic to the crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1093 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

terbutryn · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Methabenzthiazuron · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

2,4-D · organism · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

2,4-D · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

2,4-D · Avena · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

herbicide · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

52 papers: 20 positive, 32 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

48 papers more in this group

See all 52 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.