Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of 2, 4-D Ethyl Ester 80% EC to control weeds in Wheat and its residual effect on succeeding crop Blackgram

Saumi Goswami; Champak Kumar Kundu; Soumyajyoti Das; et al.

4
claims
4
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was conducted during Rabi season of 2013-14 and summer season of 2014 at RRS, New Alluvial Zone, Chakdaha, BCKV, WB to disclose the bio-efficacy and phytotoxicity of 2,4-D Ethyl Ester 80% EC in wheat and its effect on succeeding crop blackgram. The field trial consisting of eight different treatments and laid out in randomized block design with three replications. Application of 2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1and 2, 4-D EE 80% EC 0.675 kg a.i. ha-1 have resulted in effective weed control, and contributed in significantly high grain yield of wheat and no phytotoxicity through these said treatments which were statistically comparable to hand weeding twice. 2, 4-D EE 80% EC applied on wheat with different doses have found no residual effect on germination and yield of succeeding blackgram crop. So, these treatments can be a good option for wheat and succeeding black gram under sub-humid and sub-tropical condition of West Bengal.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The herbicide doses controlled weeds.

Treatment
2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
weed controle0
Direction
effectivee0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1and 2, 4-D EE 80% EC 0.675 kg a.i. ha-1 have resulted in effective weed control, and contributed in significantly high grain yield of wheat and no phytotoxicity through these said treatments which were statistically comparable to hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application produced high wheat grain yield.

Treatment
2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1and 2, 4-D EE 80% EC 0.675 kg a.i. ha-1 have resulted in effective weed control, and contributed in significantly high grain yield of wheat and no phytotoxicity through these said treatments which were statistically comparable to hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide treatment showed no wheat phytotoxicity.

Treatment
2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
no phytotoxicitye0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1and 2, 4-D EE 80% EC 0.675 kg a.i. ha-1 have resulted in effective weed control, and contributed in significantly high grain yield of wheat and no phytotoxicity through these said treatments which were statistically comparable to hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–679 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat herbicide doses showed no residual effect on blackgram germination and yield.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungoe0
Treatment
2, 4-D EE 80% ECe0
Outcome
germination and yielde0
Direction
no residual effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2, 4-D EE 80% EC applied on wheat with different doses have found no residual effect on germination and yield of succeeding blackgram crop.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 680–819 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 3 positive, 14 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.