Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Herbicide application produced high wheat grain yield.

A claim from Effect of 2, 4-D Ethyl Ester 80% EC to control weeds in Wheat and its residual effect on succeeding crop Blackgram · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide application produced high wheat grain yield.

Treatment
2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
highe0
Comparator
hand weeding twicee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of 2,4-D EE 80% EC 0.90 kg a.i. ha-1and 2, 4-D EE 80% EC 0.675 kg a.i. ha-1 have resulted in effective weed control, and contributed in significantly high grain yield of wheat and no phytotoxicity through these said treatments which were statistically comparable to hand weeding twice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 382–679

Title

Effect of 2, 4-D Ethyl Ester 80% EC to control weeds in Wheat and its residual effect on succeeding crop Blackgram

Saumi Goswami; Champak Kumar Kundu; Soumyajyoti Das; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5k.10395

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-e104faac0b45d8de52faf2d1eade634fd816fe51161aafaa91efcc2bcc89b5c4 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.