Paper · 2013 · Indian Research Journal of Extension Education

Weed Control Efficiency of Herbicides in Irrigated Wheat (Triticum aestivum)

R. K. Singh; S. R. K. Singh; U.S. Gautam

6
claims
7
verbatim quotes
22
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field study was conducted during 2009-10 at farmer’s field by the farmers under supervision by KVK Sehore for control of both type of weed flora (narrow and broad leaf weed) which is shifted in this monotomy cropping system, to find out suitable herbicide for controlling of both type of weed flora in wheat crop.post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices. Under this demonstration cost benefit ratio was found 1:2.4 under recommended practices compared to farmer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides gave 38.1% weed killing efficiency.

Treatment
Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed killing efficiencye0
Direction
effectivelye0
Value
38.1%e0
Comparator
farmer practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides gave 78.3% weed control efficiency.

Treatment
Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed control efficiencye0
Direction
effectivelye0
Value
78.3%e0
Comparator
farmer practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides reduced weed dry matter accumulation by 67.4%.

Treatment
Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
reducee0
Value
67.4%e0
Comparator
farmer practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides yielded a 23.5% weed index.

Treatment
Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DASe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed indexe0
Direction
effectivelye0
Value
23.5%e0
Comparator
farmer practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–614 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Postemergence herbicides increased wheat grain yield by 37.8% over farmer practice.

Treatment
Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DASe0
Outcome
grain yield of wheate0
Direction
increasee0
Value
37.8%e0
Comparator
farmer practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“post emergence of herbicide Metsulfuron and 2, 4-D @6gm and 500gm/ha at 30-35 DAS effectively weed killing efficiency 38.1% and weed control efficiency 78.3% and their dry matter accumulation reduce 67.4% and weed index 23.5% and increase the grain yield of wheat 37.8% compared to farmer practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 315–614 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The recommended practice gave a 1:2.4 cost benefit ratio.

Treatment
recommended practicese0
Outcome
cost benefit ratioe0
Value
1:2.4e0
Comparator
farmere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cost benefit ratio was found 1:2.4 under recommended practices compared to farmer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–721 · show in text ↑
t0

“Irrigated Wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–76 · show in text ↑

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

2,4-D · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 64 positive, 2 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    T4 gave higher weed control efficiency after hand weeding.

    Studies on 2,4-D Dimethylamine 50% SL to Control Weeds in Wheat · 2018 · compared with hand weeding twice at 20, 40 and 60 DAS

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.