Paper · 2011 · Functional Ecology

Hemiparasitic shrubs increase resource availability and multi-trophic diversity of eucalypt forest birds

David M. Watson; Hugh W. McGregor; Peter G. Spooner

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
24
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary 1. Parasitic plants are components of many habitats and have pronounced effects on animal diversity; shaping distributions, influencing movement patterns and boosting species richness. Many of these plants provide fleshy fruit, nectar, foliar arthropods and secure nest sites, but the relative influence of these nutritional and structural resources on faunal species richness and community structure remains unclear. 2. To disentangle these factors and quantify the resources provided by parasitic plants, we focused on the hemiparasitic shrub Exocarpos strictus (Santalaceae). Twenty-eight Eucalyptus camaldulensis forest plots were studied in the Gunbower-Koondrook forest in southeastern Australia, comparing riparian forests with an Exocarpos-dominated understorey with otherwise similar habitats with or without equivalent cover of the non-parasitic Acacia dealbata. Analyses of avian richness and incidence (overall and in six feeding guilds) were complemented by explicit measures of resources in both shrub types; foliage density, standing crop of fleshy fruit and foliar arthropod abundance and biomass. 3. Avian species richness was c. 50% greater and total incidences for five guilds were significantly greater in forests with the parasitic shrub, with no appreciable differences between the other two habitat types. In addition to plentiful fleshy fruits, Exocarpos supported abundant arthropods in their foliage – significantly higher in biomass than for equivalent volumes of Acacia foliage. Exocarpos had a shorter and denser structure, providing a greater range of microhabitats than the more open growing Acacia. 4. Our results demonstrate that structural and nutritional resources (both direct and indirect) provided by Exocarpos affect diversity and community composition, with each set of resources affecting different organismal groups. Rather than an exceptional system or an aberrant result, we suggest the influence of Exocarpos on species richness relates to their parasitic habit, supporting the hypothesis that parasitic plants mobilize resources from their hosts and make them available to a range of trophic levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird species richness was about 50% higher in forests with Exocarpos.

Taxon
ExocarposExocarpose1
Outcome
Avian species richnesse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
c. 50%e0
Setting
forests with the parasitic shrube0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Exocarpos
Exocarpos · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Melburnian · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Avian species richness was c. 50% greater and total incidences for five guilds were significantly greater in forests with the parasitic shrub”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“hemiparasitic shrub Exocarpos strictus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bird incidences in five guilds were significantly higher in forests with the parasitic shrub.

Taxon
ExocarposExocarpose1
Outcome
total incidences for five guildse0
Direction
greatere0
Setting
forests with the parasitic shrube0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Exocarpos
Exocarpos · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Melburnian · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“total incidences for five guilds were significantly greater in forests with the parasitic shrub”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1171–1266 · show in text ↑
e1

“hemiparasitic shrub Exocarpos strictus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–571 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Exocarpos foliage supported greater arthropod biomass than equivalent Acacia foliage.

Taxon
ExocarposExocarpose0
Interactor
arthropodsArthropodae0herbivore
Outcome
arthropods in their foliagee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Acacia foliagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Exocarpos
Exocarpos · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Melburnian · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exocarpos supported abundant arthropods in their foliage – significantly higher in biomass than for equivalent volumes of Acacia foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1377–1513 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Exocarpos had shorter and denser structure than Acacia.

Taxon
ExocarposExocarpose0
Outcome
shorter and denser structuree0
Direction
shorter and densere0
Comparator
Acaciae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Exocarpos
Exocarpos · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Melburnian · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Exocarpos had a shorter and denser structure, providing a greater range of microhabitats than the more open growing Acacia”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1637 · show in text ↑