Paper · 2009 · Weed Biology and Management

Effect of different weed management systems on the weed populations, and seedbank composition and distribution in tropical coconut plantations

SUMITH H.S. SENARATHNE; RAVI U. SANGAKKARA

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Weeds are a perennial problem in coconut plantations and cause significant losses in the nut yield. The occurrence of a wide range of weeds also causes difficulties in their eradication. The influence of five different weed management practises on the distribution and composition of the soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka was evaluated. The treatments imposed included the application of glyphosate (N‐[phosphonomethyl]‐glycine), cover cropping with Pueraria phaseoloides , tractor harrowing, tractor slashing, and tractor plowing. All the treatments were applied twice per year, except for the cover cropping treatment. In terms of a reduction in the weed biomass, the application of glyphosate and cover cropping ( Pueraria ) were more efficient in reducing the ground weed population. These methods were very effective in reducing the weed seed density in the top soil layers. Plowing and harrowing significantly reduced the seed bank in the top soil layers and shifted significant numbers of weed seeds to deeper soil profiles. However, the total germinated weed seed count increased by 123.5, 691.4, 1133.1, and 1216.5% in the 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and 25–30 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the initial germinated weed seed count in the plowing treatment. Considering all the soil layers, the decline in the germinating weed seed count was very high in the treatment plots with cover cropping and the application of glyphosate; thus, these are considered to be the best practises to reduce the germinating weed seed count in the soil of coconut plantations.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate application reduced weed biomass and ground weed population efficiently.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
application of glyphosatee0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
ground weed populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the application of glyphosate and cover cropping ( Pueraria ) were more efficient in reducing the ground weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 716–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“In terms of a reduction in the weed biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–714 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pueraria cover cropping reduced ground weed population efficiently.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
cover cropping ( Pueraria )e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Second interactor
PuerariaPuerariae0other
Outcome
ground weed populatione0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pueraria
Pueraria · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Photo by Peggy Greb. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cover cropping ( Pueraria ) were more efficient in reducing the ground weed population”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–836 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Glyphosate application reduced topsoil weed seed density.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
application of glyphosatee1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed seed densitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedOrgan / stageComparator

Verbatim

e0

“These methods were very effective in reducing the weed seed density in the top soil layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“the application of glyphosate (N‐[phosphonomethyl]‐glycine)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–478 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pueraria cover cropping reduced topsoil weed seed density.

Taxon
coconute2
Treatment
cover cropping with Pueraria phaseoloidese1
Interactor
weede0weed
Second interactor
Pueraria phaseoloidesNeustanthus phaseoloidese1other
Outcome
weed seed densitye0
Direction
reducinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Neustanthus phaseoloides
Neustanthus phaseoloides · Second interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryM108t · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These methods were very effective in reducing the weed seed density in the top soil layers.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 838–929 · show in text ↑
e1

“cover cropping with Pueraria phaseoloides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 480–521 · show in text ↑
e2

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing significantly reduced topsoil weed seed bank and moved seeds deeper.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
Plowinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
seed bank in the top soil layerse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plowing and harrowing significantly reduced the seed bank in the top soil layers and shifted significant numbers of weed seeds to deeper soil profiles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Harrowing significantly reduced topsoil weed seed bank and moved seeds deeper.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
harrowinge0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
seed bank in the top soil layerse0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Plowing and harrowing significantly reduced the seed bank in the top soil layers and shifted significant numbers of weed seeds to deeper soil profiles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1081 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing increased germinated weed seed count 123.5% at 10–15 cm.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
plowing treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total germinated weed seed counte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
123.5e0
Comparator
initial germinated weed seed counte0
Setting
10–15e0

Verbatim

e0

“the total germinated weed seed count increased by 123.5, 691.4, 1133.1, and 1216.5% in the 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and 25–30 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the initial germinated weed seed count in the plowing treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing increased germinated weed seed count 691.4% at 15–20 cm.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
plowing treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total germinated weed seed counte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
691.4e0
Qualifier
15–20e0
Comparator
initial germinated weed seed counte0

Verbatim

e0

“the total germinated weed seed count increased by 123.5, 691.4, 1133.1, and 1216.5% in the 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and 25–30 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the initial germinated weed seed count in the plowing treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing increased germinated weed seed count 1133.1% at 20–25 cm.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
plowing treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total germinated weed seed counte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1133.1e0
Qualifier
20–25e0
Comparator
initial germinated weed seed counte0

Verbatim

e0

“the total germinated weed seed count increased by 123.5, 691.4, 1133.1, and 1216.5% in the 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and 25–30 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the initial germinated weed seed count in the plowing treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plowing increased germinated weed seed count 1216.5% at 25–30 cm.

Taxon
coconute1
Treatment
plowing treatmente0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total germinated weed seed counte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1216.5%e0
Qualifier
25–30 cme0
Comparator
initial germinated weed seed counte0

Verbatim

e0

“the total germinated weed seed count increased by 123.5, 691.4, 1133.1, and 1216.5% in the 10–15, 15–20, 20–25, and 25–30 cm soil depths, respectively, compared with the initial germinated weed seed count in the plowing treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1321 · show in text ↑
e1

“soil weed seed bank in coconut plantations in the low‐country dry zone of Sri Lanka”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–371 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favor cover cropping and glyphosate to reduce germinating weed seeds in coconut plantation soil.

Taxon
coconute0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
reduce the germinating weed seed counte0
Direction
reducee0

Verbatim

e0

“cover cropping and the application of glyphosate; thus, these are considered to be the best practises to reduce the germinating weed seed count in the soil of coconut plantations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1444–1623 · show in text ↑

Neustanthus phaseoloides · weed · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glyphosate · weed · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

cover crop · weed · Cocos nucifera (coconut palm)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.