Paper · 2009 · AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES

Field response of snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) to N2-fixers Bacillus circulans and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi inoculation through accelerating rock phosphate and feldspar weathering.

O. N. Massoud; Ebtsam M. Morsy; Nadia H. El-Batanony

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

2 Abstract: This study was conducted in two successive seasons of 2006-2007 in a private farm at Kafr Dawood, Menoufiya, Egypt. It aimed to investigate the effect of inoculation of snap bean plants with 2 2 biofertilizers (AM- mycorrhizal fungi, symbiotic N -fixers (Rhizobium sp.) and asymbiotic N -fixers (Azospirillum sp. and Azotobacter sp.) in addition to B. circulans on soil amended with natural alternatives of fertilizers like rock phosphate and feldspar and their effect on growth parameters, physiological and microbiolgical parameters. In addition, snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, L.) fresh yield and its components. The obtained results indicated that the treatment No. 9 (mixture of AM- fungi, symbiotic and asymbiotic 2 N -fixers and Bacillus circulans + rock phosphate + feldspar) was superior in plant height, number of branches, number of nodules per plant and fresh yield (ton/fed) when compared with control and the 2 uninoculated plants. Inoculation with produced also the highest values of N -fixers and B. circulans populations in the rhizosphere of snap bean plants cultivated in soil amended with rock phosphate and feldspar and produced the highest infection percentage of AM- fungi. The interaction among the studied factors had significant effects on most studied characters. So, our study supports the new trend of using biofertilizers and natural alternatives as beneficial cheap sources of fertilization for sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was superior for plant height and branch number versus control and uninoculated plants.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
treatment No. 9e0
Interactor
AM- fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Second interactor
Bacillus circulanse0symbiont
Outcome
plant height, number of branchese0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and the 2 uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment No. 9 (mixture of AM- fungi, symbiotic and asymbiotic 2 N -fixers and Bacillus circulans + rock phosphate + feldspar) was superior in plant height, number of branches, number of nodules per plant and fresh yield (ton/fed) when compared with control and the 2 uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was superior for nodules per plant.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
treatment No. 9e0
Interactor
AM- fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodules per plante0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and the 2 uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment No. 9 (mixture of AM- fungi, symbiotic and asymbiotic 2 N -fixers and Bacillus circulans + rock phosphate + feldspar) was superior in plant height, number of branches, number of nodules per plant and fresh yield (ton/fed) when compared with control and the 2 uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment was superior for fresh yield.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
treatment No. 9e0
Outcome
fresh yield (ton/fed)e0
Direction
superiore0
Comparator
control and the 2 uninoculated plantse0

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment No. 9 (mixture of AM- fungi, symbiotic and asymbiotic 2 N -fixers and Bacillus circulans + rock phosphate + feldspar) was superior in plant height, number of branches, number of nodules per plant and fresh yield (ton/fed) when compared with control and the 2 uninoculated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–957 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–51 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation produced the highest rhizosphere populations of nitrogen fixers and B. circulans.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
B. circulanse0symbiont
Outcome
N -fixers and B. circulans populationse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with produced also the highest values of N -fixers and B. circulans populations in the rhizosphere of snap bean plants cultivated in soil amended with rock phosphate and feldspar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation produced the highest AM-fungal infection percentage.

Taxon
snap beane0
Treatment
Inoculatione0
Interactor
AM- fungiGlomeromycotae0symbiont
Outcome
infection percentage of AM- fungie0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation with produced also the highest values of N -fixers and B. circulans populations in the rhizosphere of snap bean plants cultivated in soil amended with rock phosphate and feldspar and produced the highest infection percentage of AM- fungi.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1208 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Interactions among the factors significantly affected most studied characters.

Taxon
snap beant0
Treatment
studied factorse0
Outcome
most studied characterse0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction among the studied factors had significant effects on most studied characters.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1209–1302 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–51 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors support biofertilizers and natural fertilizer alternatives for sustainable agriculture.

Taxon
snap beant0
Outcome
using biofertilizers and natural alternatives as beneficial cheap sources of fertilization for sustainable agriculturee0

Verbatim

e0

“our study supports the new trend of using biofertilizers and natural alternatives as beneficial cheap sources of fertilization for sustainable agriculture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1462 · show in text ↑
t0

“snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 18–51 · show in text ↑

inoculation · pest · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 7 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · Glomeromycota · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.