Paper · 2012 · International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna: Economic Benefits

Moses O. Egbe; Joseph A. Idoko

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
21
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The economics of production and profitability of intercropped pigeonpea [Cajanus cajan (L.) Millsp] genotypes with maize [Zea mays L.] and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench] were studied in two separate field experiments in 2007 and 2008. Each experiment was a 2 x 15 factorial set out in split plot design in three replications with the main objective of evaluating the economic potentials of recently introduced pigeonpea genotypes from International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) with a view to increasing and diversifying household income in Southern Guinea Savanna of Nigeria. Though it depressed pigeonpea grain yields, intercropping consistently gave higher net benefits than sole cropping in the pigeonpea/maize systems. ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in both pigeonpea/maize and pigeonpea/sorghum intercropping systems (N200, 082.00/ha and N110, 399.00/ha respectively). It also produced the highest marginal rate of returns and returns per naira investment in the pigeonpea/maize systems. Sole pigeonpea was more remunerative than many intercropped pigeonpea with sorghum. Most of the new varieties proved superior to the Farmer’s variety in both cropping systems, with consequent higher profitability. This implies potential increase in household incomes and alternative farm enterprise with the adoption of any of these new varieties in the intercropping systems studied.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping consistently gave higher net benefits than sole cropping in the pigeonpea/maize systems.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
net benefitse1
Direction
highere1
Comparator
sole croppinge1
Setting
Southern Guinea Savannat0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though it depressed pigeonpea grain yields, intercropping consistently gave higher net benefits than sole cropping in the pigeonpea/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping depressed pigeonpea grain yields.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Outcome
pigeonpea grain yieldse1
Direction
depressede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e1

“Though it depressed pigeonpea grain yields, intercropping consistently gave higher net benefits than sole cropping in the pigeonpea/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 612–757 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in the pigeonpea/maize intercropping system, N200, 082.00/ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICPL 87e2
Outcome
net benefitse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
N200, 082.00/hae2
Qualifier
pigeonpea/maizee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in both pigeonpea/maize and pigeonpea/sorghum intercropping systems (N200, 082.00/ha and N110, 399.00/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in the pigeonpea/sorghum intercropping system, N110, 399.00/ha.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICPL 87e2
Outcome
net benefitse2
Direction
higheste2
Value
N110, 399.00/hae2
Qualifier
pigeonpea/sorghume2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in both pigeonpea/maize and pigeonpea/sorghum intercropping systems (N200, 082.00/ha and N110, 399.00/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–915 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ICPL 87 gave the highest marginal rate of returns and returns per naira investment in the pigeonpea/maize systems.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Material
ICPL 87e2
Outcome
marginal rate of returns and returns per naira investmente3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e2

“ICPL 87 gave the highest net benefits in both pigeonpea/maize and pigeonpea/sorghum intercropping systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 759–864 · show in text ↑
e3

“It also produced the highest marginal rate of returns and returns per naira investment in the pigeonpea/maize systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 917–1034 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole pigeonpea was more remunerative than many intercropped pigeonpea with sorghum.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
Sole pigeonpeae4
Outcome
remunerativee4
Direction
more remunerativee4
Comparator
intercropped pigeonpea with sorghume4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e4

“Sole pigeonpea was more remunerative than many intercropped pigeonpea with sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1118 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Adopting the new varieties in intercropping implies potential increase in household incomes.

Taxon
PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
Treatment
adoption of any of these new varietiese6
Outcome
household incomese6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cajanus cajan
Cajanus cajan · TaxonFilo gèn' · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of Pigeonpea Genotypes for Intercropping with Maize and Sorghum in Southern Guinea Savanna”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–101 · show in text ↑
e6

“This implies potential increase in household incomes and alternative farm enterprise with the adoption of any of these new varieties in the intercropping systems studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1419 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Results differ

117 papers: 94 positive, 23 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

113 papers more in this group

See all 117 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.