Paper · 1974 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Effects of plant density, irrigation and potassium and sodium fertilizers on sugar beet: II. Influence of soil moisture and weather

A. P. Draycott; M. J. Durrant; A. B. Messem

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
7
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary The amount of soil moisture used by sugar beet was determined weekly between May and October (1970–2) in plots testing 18500 and 124000 plants/ha with and without irrigation. When leaves covered more than 60% of the ground (after mid-June with the large density and after mid-July with the small density) the crop used water at the potential transpiration rate even with soil moisture deficits on plots without irrigation of up to 170 mm. Therefore as irrigation greatly increased sugar yield in 1970 and 1972, it probably did not do so simply by satisfying the crop's water need. In 1970 irrigation appeared to act partly by decreasing the time taken to attain complete leaf cover but in 1972 irrigation had only a slight effect on leaf cover but greatly increased sugar yield, particularly of the large population. With little rainfall, the large density rapidly exhausted the available moisture from the plough layer. It seems likely therefore that irrigation increased yield by giving more leaf cover early and by improving nutrient supply but not by supplying extra water for transpiration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugar beet used water at potential transpiration rate after canopy cover exceeded 60%, even under deficits up to 170 mm.

Outcome
potential transpiration ratee0
Qualifier
soil moisture deficits on plots without irrigation of up to 170 mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“When leaves covered more than 60% of the ground (after mid-June with the large density and after mid-July with the small density) the crop used water at the potential transpiration rate even with soil moisture deficits on plots without irrigation of up to 170 mm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–446 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation greatly increased sugar yield in 1970 and 1972.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
greatly increasede0
Qualifier
1970 and 1972e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“irrigation greatly increased sugar yield in 1970 and 1972”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 460–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1970 irrigation appeared to shorten time to complete leaf cover.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
time taken to attain complete leaf covere0
Direction
decreasinge0
Qualifier
In 1970e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In 1970 irrigation appeared to act partly by decreasing the time taken to attain complete leaf cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–689 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1972 irrigation had only a slight effect on leaf cover.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
leaf covere0
Qualifier
in 1972e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1972 irrigation had only a slight effect on leaf cover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–751 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 1972 irrigation greatly increased sugar yield, especially at high density.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
sugar yielde0
Direction
greatly increasede0
Qualifier
particularly of the large populatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in 1972 irrigation had only a slight effect on leaf cover but greatly increased sugar yield, particularly of the large population.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At low rainfall, high plant density quickly exhausted moisture in the plough layer.

Treatment
large densitye0
Outcome
available moisture from the plough layere0
Direction
exhaustede0
Qualifier
With little rainfalle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris
Beta vulgaris subsp. vulgaris · TaxonQuadell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With little rainfall, the large density rapidly exhausted the available moisture from the plough layer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–928 · show in text ↑
t0

“sugar beet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–87 · show in text ↑

irrigation · quality: sugar starch · Beta vulgaris (beet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 30 positive, 14 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.