Paper · 1992 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Matriconditioning of Vegetable Seeds to Improve Stand Establishment in Early Field Plantings

Anwar A. Khan; James D. Maguire; George S. Abawi; et al.

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
85
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A matriconditioning procedure based on the matric properties of Micro-Cel E and expanded vermiculite #5 has proved effective in improving seedling emergence in growth chambers. The major objectives of this study were to examine some physical characteristics of the carriers and their effectiveness as preplant conditioning media in improving stand establishment of vegetable seeds in field plantings. Carrier characteristics included no detectable solute or osmotic potential, low electrical conductivity (0.48-0.04 mmho/cm), high water-retaining capacity (450% to 600%), a pH range of 7.0 to 8.4, and ability to effectively control seed hydration (conditioning) at low matric potential. The seed: carrier: water ratio for seed conditioning ranged from 1:0.3-0.5:1-2 (by weight). In a field trial, conditioning of `Long Imperator' and `Nantes' carrot (Daucus carota var. sativus Hoffm.) seeds reduced the time to 10% of final emergence (T 10 ) by 2.6 to 2.8 days and to 50% of final emergence (T 50 ) by 2.1 to 3.0 days. Conditioning increased the final emergence percentage by 39% in 1-year-old `Long Imperator' compared to 150% in 4-year-old `Nantes' seeds. In another field trial, the effect of conditioning on stand establishment was evaluated in `Jackpot' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), `California Wonder' pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), and `BBL 47' snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) seeds. In tomato, conditioning reduced the T 10 by 0.9 day, had no effect on T 50 , and increased the emergence percentage by 86%. In pepper, conditioning reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 1.5 days and increased the percentage emergence by 30%. In snap bean seeds, conditioning in Micro-Ccl E reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 0.8 day but adversely affected the percentage emergence. Further reductions in T 10 and T 50 (1.2 and 1.6 days, respectively) and restoration of percentage emergence to control level occurred upon addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioning. Fungicides added to carrot, tomato, and pepper seeds, with or without conditioning, showed no additional improvements and, in a few cases, adversely affected emergence. A preplant conditioning in Micro-Ccl E, alone or in combination with GA 3 , smears to be a viable alternative to conditioning! seeds in liquid carriers. Chemical name used: gibberellic acid (GA 3 )

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Matriconditioning improved seedling emergence in growth chambers.

Taxon
Vegetable Seedst0
Treatment
matriconditioning proceduree0
Outcome
seedling emergencee0
Direction
improvinge0
Setting
growth chamberse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“A matriconditioning procedure based on the matric properties of Micro-Cel E and expanded vermiculite #5 has proved effective in improving seedling emergence in growth chambers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–175 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning shortened carrot T10 by 2.6 to 2.8 days.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Material
`Long Imperator' and `Nantes'e0
Treatment
conditioninge0
Outcome
time to 10% of final emergence (T 10 )e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.6 to 2.8 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conditioning of `Long Imperator' and `Nantes' carrot (Daucus carota var. sativus Hoffm.) seeds reduced the time to 10% of final emergence (T 10 ) by 2.6 to 2.8 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–962 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning shortened carrot T50 by 2.1 to 3.0 days.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Material
`Long Imperator' and `Nantes'e0
Treatment
conditioninge0
Outcome
50% of final emergence (T 50 )e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
2.1 to 3.0 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“conditioning of `Long Imperator' and `Nantes' carrot (Daucus carota var. sativus Hoffm.) seeds reduced the time to 10% of final emergence (T 10 ) by 2.6 to 2.8 days and to 50% of final emergence (T 50 ) by 2.1 to 3.0 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–1019 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning increased final emergence of one-year-old Long Imperator carrot seeds by 39%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Material
`Long Imperator'e0
Treatment
Conditioninge0
Outcome
final emergence percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
39%e0
Qualifier
1-year-olde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conditioning increased the final emergence percentage by 39% in 1-year-old `Long Imperator'”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“carrot (Daucus carota var. sativus Hoffm.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning increased final emergence of four-year-old Nantes carrot seeds by 150%.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae1
Material
`Nantes'e0
Treatment
Conditioninge0
Outcome
final emergence percentagee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
150%e0
Qualifier
4-year-olde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Conditioning increased the final emergence percentage by 39% in 1-year-old `Long Imperator' compared to 150% in 4-year-old `Nantes' seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1021–1158 · show in text ↑
e1

“carrot (Daucus carota var. sativus Hoffm.) seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–892 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning shortened tomato T10 by 0.9 day.

Material
`Jackpot'e0
Treatment
conditioninge1
Outcome
T 10e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
0.9 daye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Jackpot' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“In tomato, conditioning reduced the T 10 by 0.9 day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1452 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning had no effect on tomato T50.

Material
`Jackpot'e0
Treatment
conditioninge1
Outcome
T 50e1
Direction
no effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Jackpot' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“In tomato, conditioning reduced the T 10 by 0.9 day, had no effect on T 50”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1475 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning increased tomato emergence by 86%.

Material
`Jackpot'e0
Treatment
conditioninge1
Outcome
emergence percentagee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
86%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Jackpot' tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1299 · show in text ↑
e1

“In tomato, conditioning reduced the T 10 by 0.9 day, had no effect on T 50 , and increased the emergence percentage by 86%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1401–1523 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning shortened pepper T10 and T50 by 1.5 days.

Taxon
peppere0
Material
`California Wonder'e0
Treatment
conditioninge1
Outcome
T 10 and T 50e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
1.5 dayse1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`California Wonder' pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“In pepper, conditioning reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 1.5 days”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1586 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conditioning increased pepper emergence by 30%.

Taxon
peppere0
Material
`California Wonder'e0
Treatment
conditioninge1
Outcome
percentage emergencee1
Direction
increasede1
Value
30%e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`California Wonder' pepper (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1348 · show in text ↑
e1

“In pepper, conditioning reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 1.5 days and increased the percentage emergence by 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-Ccl E conditioning shortened snap bean T10 and T50 by 0.8 day.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
`BBL 47'e0
Treatment
conditioning in Micro-Ccl Ee1
Outcome
T 10 and T 50e1
Direction
reducede1
Value
0.8 daye1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“`BBL 47' snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1393 · show in text ↑
e1

“In snap bean seeds, conditioning in Micro-Ccl E reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 0.8 day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1718 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Micro-Ccl E conditioning adversely affected snap bean percentage emergence.

Taxon
snap beane0
Material
`BBL 47'e0
Treatment
conditioning in Micro-Ccl Ee1
Outcome
percentage emergencee1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“`BBL 47' snap bean (Phaseolus vulgaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1393 · show in text ↑
e1

“In snap bean seeds, conditioning in Micro-Ccl E reduced the T 10 and T 50 by 0.8 day but adversely affected the percentage emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1634–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding GA 3 during snap bean conditioning further shortened T10 by 1.2 days.

Taxon
snap beane1
Treatment
addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioninge0
Outcome
T 10e0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
1.2e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Further reductions in T 10 and T 50 (1.2 and 1.6 days, respectively) and restoration of percentage emergence to control level occurred upon addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1953 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding GA 3 during snap bean conditioning further shortened T50 by 1.6 days.

Taxon
snap beane1
Treatment
addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioninge0
Outcome
T 50e0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
1.6 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Further reductions in T 10 and T 50 (1.2 and 1.6 days, respectively) and restoration of percentage emergence to control level occurred upon addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1768–1953 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding GA 3 restored snap bean emergence to the control level.

Taxon
snap beane1
Treatment
addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioninge0
Outcome
percentage emergencee0
Direction
restoratione0
Comparator
control levele0

Verbatim

e0

“restoration of percentage emergence to control level occurred upon addition of 0.001 mM GA 3 during conditioning”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1841–1953 · show in text ↑
e1

“snap bean seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1652 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding fungicides produced no additional emergence improvement for carrot, tomato and pepper and sometimes worsened emergence.

Taxon
carrot, tomato, and peppere0
Treatment
Fungicidese0
Outcome
emergencee0
Direction
no additional improvementse0
Qualifier
in a few cases, adversely affectede0
Comparator
with or without conditioninge0

Verbatim

e0

“Fungicides added to carrot, tomato, and pepper seeds, with or without conditioning, showed no additional improvements and, in a few cases, adversely affected emergence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1955–2122 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors considered conditioning in Micro-Ccl E, alone or with GA 3, a viable preplant option.

Taxon
Vegetable Seedst0
Treatment
preplant conditioning in Micro-Ccl Ee0
Outcome
viable alternative to conditioning! seeds in liquid carrierse0

Verbatim

e0

“A preplant conditioning in Micro-Ccl E, alone or in combination with GA 3 , smears to be a viable alternative to conditioning! seeds in liquid carriers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2124–2275 · show in text ↑
t0

“Vegetable Seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 21–36 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ

30 papers: 27 positive, 3 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.