Paper · 2010 · Journal of Plant Protection Research

Comparison of Disease Occurrence and Green Leaf Area (GLA) of Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop and Differentiated Fungicidal Protection Used

Dariusz Wyczling; Leszek Lenc; Czesław Sadowski

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
11
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Comparison of Disease Occurrence and Green Leaf Area (GLA) of Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop and Differentiated Fungicidal Protection Used The effect of the forecrop and differentiated chemical plant protection on the intensity of fungal leaf diseases of winter wheat were studied from 1999-2008. Five (I-V) separate experiments were conducted in Mazury (Szestno I,), Żuławy Wiślane (Lisewo II), and Powiśle (Wielgłowy III, IV and Radostowo V). The intensity of diseases varied. Powdery mildew ( Blumeria graminis ) was noted in relatively low or trace intensity. On the other hand, there was a large amount of necrotic leaf spot complexes caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, Stagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Fusarium spp. In 2000, 2001 and 2003 brown rust ( Puccinia recondita ) was noted in high intensity. The applied treatments were very effective in reducing fungal disease on leaves. The surface of the upper leaves (Green leaf area - GLA) with no symptoms of infection and fungicide use were significantly higher than in the control. It was also found that the GLA of crops grown after oilseed rape was higher than the GLA of crops grown after wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The applied fungicide treatments very effectively reduced fungal leaf disease in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
The applied treatmentse1
Outcome
fungal disease on leavese1
Direction
reducinge1
Qualifier
very effectivee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e1

“The applied treatments were very effective in reducing fungal disease on leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–920 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fungicide use together with absence of infection symptoms gave significantly higher green leaf area than the control in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
fungicide usee2
Outcome
Green leaf areae2
Direction
highere2
Qualifier
with no symptoms of infectione2
Comparator
controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e2

“The surface of the upper leaves (Green leaf area - GLA) with no symptoms of infection and fungicide use were significantly higher than in the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 922–1071 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat grown after oilseed rape had higher green leaf area than wheat grown after wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
crops grown after oilseed rapee3
Outcome
GLAe3
Direction
highere3
Comparator
crops grown after wheate3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e3

“It was also found that the GLA of crops grown after oilseed rape was higher than the GLA of crops grown after wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1073–1188 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Powdery mildew caused by Blumeria graminis was noted at relatively low or trace intensity in winter wheat.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Blumeria graminisBlumeria graminise4pathogen
Outcome
Powdery mildewe4
Qualifier
relatively low or trace intensitye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Blumeria graminis
Blumeria graminis · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryClemson University - USDA Cooperative Extension Slide Series · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e4

“Powdery mildew ( Blumeria graminis ) was noted in relatively low or trace intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 487–570 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Brown rust caused by Puccinia recondita was noted at high intensity in winter wheat in 2000, 2001 and 2003.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Puccinia reconditaPuccinia reconditae5pathogen
Outcome
brown ruste5
Value
high intensitye5
Qualifier
In 2000, 2001 and 2003e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Puccinia recondita
Puccinia recondita · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categorybjoerns · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e5

“In 2000, 2001 and 2003 brown rust ( Puccinia recondita ) was noted in high intensity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 755–839 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A large amount of necrotic leaf spot complexes caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola and Stagonospora nodorum occurred in winter wheat, with further leaf spot pathogens named in the qualifier.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
Mycosphaerella graminicolaZymoseptoria triticie6pathogen
Second interactor
Stagonospora nodorumParastagonospora nodorume6pathogen
Outcome
necrotic leaf spot complexese6
Value
large amounte6
Qualifier
Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Fusarium sppe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Zymoseptoria tritici
Zymoseptoria tritici · InteractorMaccheek · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Parastagonospora nodorum
Parastagonospora nodorum · Second interactorM. Fernandez-Gamarra, L. Talavera-Stefani, Y. Mongelos-Franco, C. Burgos-Cantoni, A. Sanabria-Velazquez, G. Caballero-Mairesse, P. Chavez, M. Vargas, R. Scholz, · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Winter Wheat Depending on the Forecrop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–100 · show in text ↑
e6

“there was a large amount of necrotic leaf spot complexes caused by Mycosphaerella graminicola, Stagonospora nodorum, Pyrenophora tritici-repentis and Fusarium spp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 591–753 · show in text ↑

Brassica napus · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fungicide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

53 papers: 42 positive, 11 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.