Paper · 1995 · Canadian Journal of Plant Science

Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate

J. Norrie; J. Charbonneau; A. Gosselin; et al.

8
claims
24
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Irrigation dynamics and the response of greenhouse tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. 'Caruso') to different irrigation management treatments (nutrient solution EC and irrigation matric potential setpoints) were examined in plants grown in peat-based substrate during either the spring or fall of 1989. Two nutrient solutions with differing electrical conductivity (EC of 1.5 and 3.0 dS m −1 ) were automatically applied to plants until saturation at one of two substrate matric potential (SMP) setpoints (−6.5 or −4.5 kPa). Yield measurements indicated no significant effects due to different SMP setpoints but spring total yield and average marketable fruit weight were higher for low-EC solution treatments. Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in the fall under the highest EC treatment. Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution. The EC of peat substrates was also found to be higher than applied solutions indicating an overall accumulation of salts within the peat under different irrigation regimes, even with periodic overwatering. This study indicates that increasing nutrient solution EC from 1.5 to 3.0 dS m −1 can negatively affect the production and nutritional status of tomato plants more than changing irrigation setpoints from −4.5 to −6.5 kPa. Key words: Electrical conductivity, fruit quality, peat, tensiometers, matric potential

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Changing substrate matric potential setpoints did not significantly affect tomato yield.

Treatment
different SMP setpointse0
Outcome
Yielde0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Yield measurements indicated no significant effects due to different SMP setpoints”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 528–610 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low conductivity solution increased spring total tomato yield.

Treatment
low-EC solution treatmentse0
Outcome
spring total yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high-EC solutiont1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring total yield and average marketable fruit weight were higher for low-EC solution treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low conductivity solution increased average marketable fruit weight in spring.

Treatment
low-EC solution treatmentse0
Outcome
average marketable fruit weighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
high-EC solutiont1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spring total yield and average marketable fruit weight were higher for low-EC solution treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 615–712 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in fall under the highest conductivity treatment.

Treatment
highest EC treatmente0
Outcome
Blossom-end rote0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in the falle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Blossom-end rot was slightly higher in the fall under the highest EC treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 714–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution increased foliar nitrogen, potassium and zinc concentrations in spring tomato.

Organ / stage
Foliare0
Treatment
high-EC solutione0
Outcome
nitrogen, potassium, zince0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution increased foliar manganese concentration in spring tomato.

Organ / stage
Foliare0
Treatment
high-EC solutione0
Outcome
manganesee0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High conductivity solution decreased foliar calcium concentration in spring tomato.

Treatment
high-EC solutione0
Outcome
calciume0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peat substrate conductivity exceeded that of applied solutions, indicating salt accumulation despite periodic overwatering.

Outcome
EC of peat substratese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
even with periodic overwateringe0
Comparator
applied solutionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The EC of peat substrates was also found to be higher than applied solutions indicating an overall accumulation of salts within the peat under different irrigation regimes, even with periodic overwatering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 984–1189 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of irrigation management of greenhouse tomato: Yield, nutrition, and salinity of peat substrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–102 · show in text ↑
t1

“Foliar mineral concentration analysis of spring-grown plants indicated increases in nitrogen, potassium, zinc, and manganese, and a decrease in calcium in plants receiving high-EC solution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–983 · show in text ↑

growing medium · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

141 papers: 112 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 112 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Total tomato fruit yield was similar across substrates.

    Peat-based Organic Growbags as a Solution to the Mineral Wool Waste Problem · 2008 · compared with peat-cocos substrate or mineral wool

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

137 papers more in this group

See all 141 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.