Paper · 1997 · New Phytologist

Effects of soil compaction on plant growth phosphorus uptake and morphological characteristics of vesicular—arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of Trifolium subterraneum

H. NADIAN; S. E. SMITH; A. M. ALSTON; et al.

8
claims
23
verbatim quotes
67
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SUMMARY We investigated the effect of soil compaction and phosphorus (P) application on morphological characteristics of mycorrhizal colonization and growth responses, to determine the reasons for reduced responses observed in our previous work with compacted soil. Growth, phosphorus (P) uptake and intensity of vesicular–arbuscular (VA) mycorrhizal colonization were studied in clover plants ( Trifolium subterraneum L.) with and without VA mycorrhizal colonization at two P applications and three levels of soil compaction. Phosphorus was supplied either at constant mass concentration (mg P kg −1 soil) or at constant volume concentration (mg P dm −3 soil). Increasing bulk density of the soil from 1·1 to 1.6 Mg m −3 significantly decreased root length and shoot d. wt, but increased the diameter of both main axes and first order lateral roots regardless of P application. Total P uptake and shoot d. wt of clover plants colonized by Glomus intraradices (Schenck & Smith) were significantly greater than those of non‐mycorrhizal plants at all levels of soil compaction and both P applications. However, soil compaction to a bulk density of 1.6 Mg m −3 (penetrometer resistance = 3.5 MPa at a matric potential of − 33 kPa) significantly decreased mycorrhizal growth response. There was no evidence that the increased volume concentration of P at high bulk densities was responsible for the reduced responses. Soil compaction had no significant effect on the fraction of root length containing arbuscules and vesicles, but total root length colonized by arbuscules, vesicles or by any combination of arbuscules, vesicles and intra‐radical hyphae significantly decreased as soil compaction was increased. The air‐filled porosity of highly compacted soil, which varied from 0.07 to 0.11 over the range of matric potentials encountered (− 33 and − 100 kPa), had no significant effect on the intensity of internal colonization.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil bulk density significantly decreased root length and shoot dry weight of Trifolium subterraneum.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
Increasing bulk density of the soile0
Outcome
root length and shoot d. wte1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing bulk density of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–697 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly decreased root length and shoot d. wt”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 722–773 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing soil bulk density increased the root diameter of both main axes and first order lateral roots of Trifolium subterraneum regardless of P application.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
Increasing bulk density of the soile0
Outcome
diameter of both main axes and first order lateral rootse2
Direction
increasede2
Qualifier
regardless of P applicatione2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing bulk density of the soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–697 · show in text ↑
e2

“increased the diameter of both main axes and first order lateral roots regardless of P application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 779–877 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total P uptake and shoot dry weight of Trifolium subterraneum colonized by Glomus intraradices were significantly greater than those of non-mycorrhizal plants.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
colonized by Glomus intraradicese3
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese3symbiont
Outcome
Total P uptake and shoot d. wte3
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
non‐mycorrhizal plantse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total P uptake and shoot d. wt of clover plants colonized by Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–959 · show in text ↑
e4

“were significantly greater than those of non‐mycorrhizal plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1041 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction to a bulk density of 1.6 significantly decreased the mycorrhizal growth response of Trifolium subterraneum.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
soil compaction to a bulk densitye5
Interactor
Glomus intraradicesRhizophagus intraradicese3symbiont
Outcome
mycorrhizal growth responsee6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e3

“Total P uptake and shoot d. wt of clover plants colonized by Glomus intraradices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–959 · show in text ↑
e5

“soil compaction to a bulk density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1142 · show in text ↑
e6

“significantly decreased mycorrhizal growth response”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1228–1279 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil compaction had no significant effect on the fraction of root length containing arbuscules and vesicles in Trifolium subterraneum.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
Soil compactione7
Outcome
fraction of root length containing arbuscules and vesiclese7
Direction
no significant effecte7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e7

“Soil compaction had no significant effect on the fraction of root length containing arbuscules and vesicles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1414–1521 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total root length colonized by arbuscules, vesicles or intra-radical hyphae decreased significantly as soil compaction increased.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
soil compactione2
Outcome
total root length colonized by arbusculese1
Direction
decreasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e1

“total root length colonized by arbuscules, vesicles or by any combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1527–1600 · show in text ↑
e2

“significantly decreased as soil compaction was increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1650–1706 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Highly compacted soil had no significant effect on the intensity of internal mycorrhizal colonization of Trifolium subterraneum.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
highly compacted soile1
Outcome
intensity of internal colonizatione2
Direction
no significant effecte2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e1

“of highly compacted soil, which varied from 0.07 to 0.11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1732–1788 · show in text ↑
e2

“had no significant effect on the intensity of internal colonization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1859–1926 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased volume concentration of P at high bulk densities was not responsible for the reduced mycorrhizal responses.

Taxon
Trifolium subterraneumTrifolium subterraneumt0
Treatment
increased volume concentration of Pe1
Outcome
reduced responsese1
Direction
reducede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium subterraneum
Trifolium subterraneum · TaxonKevin Thiele from Perth, Australia · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“colonization of Trifolium subterraneum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 131–169 · show in text ↑
e1

“There was no evidence that the increased volume concentration of P at high bulk densities was responsible for the reduced responses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1412 · show in text ↑

tillage · Rhizophagus intraradices · Trifolium subterraneumResults agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.