Paper · 1996 · Tree Physiology

Leaf, branch, stand and landscape scale measurements of volatile organic compound fluxes from U.S. woodlands

A. Guenther; J. Greenberg; P. Harley; et al.

19
claims
25
verbatim quotes
116
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993. Fluxes from individual leaves and branches were estimated with enclosure techniques and used to initialize and evaluate VOC emission model estimates. Ambient measurements were used to estimate above canopy fluxes for entire stands and landscapes. The branch enclosure experiments revealed 78 VOCs. Hexenol derivatives were the most commonly observed oxygenated compounds. The branch measurements also revealed high rates of isoprene emission from three genera of plants (Albizia, Chusqua and Mahonia) and high rates of monoterpene emission from three genera (Atriplex, Chrysthamnus and Sorbus) for which VOC emission rates have not been reported. Measurements on an additional 34 species confirmed previous results. Leaf enclosure measurements of isoprene emission rates from Quercus were substantially higher than the rates used in existing emission models. Model predictions of diurnal variations in isoprene fluxes were generally within +/- 35% of observed flux variations. Measurements with a fast response analyzer demonstrated that 60 min is a reasonable time resolution for biogenic emission models. Average daytime stand scale (hundreds of m) flux measurements ranged from about 1.3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak stand to 1.5-2.5 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a mixed forest stand. Morning, evening and nighttime fluxes were less than 0.1 mg C m(-2) h(-1). Average daytime landscape scale (tens of km) flux measurements ranged from about 3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak-aspen and rangeland landscape to about 7 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a deciduous forest landscape. Fluxes predicted by recent versions (BEIS2, BEIS2.1) of a biogenic emission model were within 10 to 50% of observed fluxes and about 300% higher than those predicted by a previous version of the model (BEIS).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch enclosures of woodland plants revealed 78 VOCs.

Taxon
woodlandse0
Outcome
VOCse1
Value
78e1

Verbatim

e0

“Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“The branch enclosure experiments revealed 78 VOCs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–397 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hexenol derivatives were the most commonly observed oxygenated compounds in woodland branch emissions.

Taxon
woodlandse0
Outcome
Hexenol derivativese2
Qualifier
most commonly observed oxygenated compoundse2

Verbatim

e0

“Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“Hexenol derivatives were the most commonly observed oxygenated compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–471 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Albizia showed high isoprene emission rates.

Taxon
AlbiziaAlbiziae3
Outcome
isoprene emissione3
Direction
highe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Albizia
Albizia · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryAlfredo F. Fuentes Claros · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“high rates of isoprene emission from three genera of plants (Albizia, Chusqua and Mahonia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chusqua showed high isoprene emission rates.

Taxon
Chusquae3
Outcome
isoprene emissione3
Direction
highe3

Verbatim

e3

“high rates of isoprene emission from three genera of plants (Albizia, Chusqua and Mahonia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mahonia showed high isoprene emission rates.

Taxon
MahoniaMahoniae3
Outcome
isoprene emissione3
Direction
highe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mahonia
Mahonia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)The original uploader was JoJan at English Wikipedia . · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“high rates of isoprene emission from three genera of plants (Albizia, Chusqua and Mahonia)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 511–601 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Atriplex showed high monoterpene emission rates.

Taxon
AtriplexAtriplexe4
Outcome
monoterpene emissione4
Direction
highe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Atriplex
Atriplex · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Stan Shebs · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“high rates of monoterpene emission from three genera (Atriplex, Chrysthamnus and Sorbus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chrysthamnus showed high monoterpene emission rates.

Taxon
Chrysthamnuse4
Outcome
monoterpene emissione4
Direction
highe4

Verbatim

e4

“high rates of monoterpene emission from three genera (Atriplex, Chrysthamnus and Sorbus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbus showed high monoterpene emission rates.

Taxon
SorbusSorbuse4
Outcome
monoterpene emissione4
Direction
highe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorbus
Sorbus · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDominicus Johannes Bergsma. · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“high rates of monoterpene emission from three genera (Atriplex, Chrysthamnus and Sorbus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 606–694 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Measurements on 34 additional species confirmed previous VOC emission results.

Taxon
additional 34 speciese5
Outcome
previous resultse5
Direction
confirmede5

Verbatim

e5

“Measurements on an additional 34 species confirmed previous results”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–815 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf enclosure isoprene emission rates from Quercus were substantially higher than the rates used in existing emission models.

Taxon
QuercusQuercuse6
Outcome
isoprene emission ratese6
Direction
substantially highere6
Comparator
the rates used in existing emission modelse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Quercus
Quercus · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)WikiVagant · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“Leaf enclosure measurements of isoprene emission rates from Quercus were substantially higher than the rates used in existing emission models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–958 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Model predictions of diurnal isoprene flux variations were within ±35% of observed variations.

Outcome
diurnal variations in isoprene fluxese7
Value
+/- 35%e7
Comparator
observed flux variationse7

Verbatim

e7

“Model predictions of diurnal variations in isoprene fluxes were generally within +/- 35% of observed flux variations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1076 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A 60 min time resolution is reasonable for biogenic emission models.

Outcome
time resolution for biogenic emission modelse7
Value
60 mine7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e7

“Measurements with a fast response analyzer demonstrated that 60 min is a reasonable time resolution for biogenic emission models”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1206 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average daytime stand-scale flux over a shrub oak stand was 1.3 mg C m(-2) h(-1).

Taxon
shrub oake1
Outcome
flux measurementse1
Value
1.3 mg C m(-2) h(-1)e1
Setting
stand scale (hundreds of m)e1

Verbatim

e0

“Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average daytime stand scale (hundreds of m) flux measurements ranged from about 1.3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak stand to 1.5-2.5 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a mixed forest stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average daytime stand-scale flux over a mixed forest stand was 1.5-2.5 mg C m(-2) h(-1).

Taxon
mixed foreste1
Outcome
flux measurementse1
Value
1.5-2.5 mg C m(-2) h(-1)e1
Setting
stand scale (hundreds of m)e1

Verbatim

e0

“Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Average daytime stand scale (hundreds of m) flux measurements ranged from about 1.3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak stand to 1.5-2.5 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a mixed forest stand”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1383 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morning, evening and nighttime fluxes from woodlands were less than 0.1 mg C m(-2) h(-1).

Taxon
woodlandse0
Outcome
Morning, evening and nighttime fluxese2
Direction
less thane2
Value
0.1 mg C m(-2) h(-1)e2

Verbatim

e0

“Natural volatile organic compound (VOC) fluxes were measured in three U.S. woodlands in summer 1993”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–99 · show in text ↑
e2

“Morning, evening and nighttime fluxes were less than 0.1 mg C m(-2) h(-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1458 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average daytime landscape-scale flux over a shrub oak-aspen and rangeland landscape was about 3 mg C m(-2) h(-1).

Taxon
shrub oak-aspene1
Outcome
flux measurementse1
Value
3 mg C m(-2) h(-1)e1
Setting
landscape scale (tens of km)e1

Verbatim

e1

“Average daytime landscape scale (tens of km) flux measurements ranged from about 3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak-aspen and rangeland landscape to about 7 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a deciduous forest landscape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1666 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Average daytime landscape-scale flux over a deciduous forest landscape was about 7 mg C m(-2) h(-1).

Taxon
deciduous foreste1
Outcome
flux measurementse1
Value
7 mg C m(-2) h(-1)e1
Setting
landscape scale (tens of km)e1

Verbatim

e1

“Average daytime landscape scale (tens of km) flux measurements ranged from about 3 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a shrub oak-aspen and rangeland landscape to about 7 mg C m(-2) h(-1) for a deciduous forest landscape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1460–1666 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BEIS2 and BEIS2.1 predicted fluxes within 10 to 50% of observed fluxes.

Outcome
Fluxes predicted by recent versionse0
Value
10 to 50%e0
Comparator
observed fluxese0

Verbatim

e0

“Fluxes predicted by recent versions (BEIS2, BEIS2.1) of a biogenic emission model were within 10 to 50% of observed fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1790 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fluxes predicted by BEIS2 versions were about 300% higher than those of the previous BEIS model.

Outcome
Fluxes predicted by recent versionse0
Direction
highere1
Value
300%e1
Comparator
a previous version of the model (BEIS)e1

Verbatim

e0

“Fluxes predicted by recent versions (BEIS2, BEIS2.1) of a biogenic emission model were within 10 to 50% of observed fluxes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1668–1790 · show in text ↑
e1

“and about 300% higher than those predicted by a previous version of the model (BEIS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1791–1875 · show in text ↑