Paper · 2010 · AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY

Effects of basal media, salt concentrations, antioxidant supplements and co-effects on the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation efficiency in maize

Du Hewei; Wu Huixia; Yan Jianbing; et al.

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
8
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Transformation efficiency enhancement in maize Agrobacterium-mediated transformation was tested using four different basal media, five levels of N6 salts, two antioxidants and copper sulfate. In the absence of the antioxidants L-cysteine and dithiothreitol (DTT), the frequencies of transient GUS expression was higher using Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) and Murashige and Skoog (MS) media as an alternative to Chu (N6) and Ducan (D). N6 basal medium exhibited better performance in the presence of antioxidants than MS, LS and D basal media. Five different levels of N6 medium salts (10, 30, 50, 70 and 100%) were tested, and the highest transformation efficiency was 15.9% under a 50% salt concentration, followed by 6.4% transformation efficiency with 70 and 3.2% under 100% salt conditions. More than 95% of infected immature embryos exhibited GUS staining under 10 and 30% salt concentrations, however none of the embryos developed into embryogenic callus, indicating that low salt levels favored T-DNA delivery, but not stable transformation. Additions of DTT or L-cysteine, or a combination of L-cysteine and DTT, showed a significant improvement in the frequency of transient GUS expression, however increases were not observed with independent CuSO4treatments. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern-blot analysis confirmed T-DNA integration into the maize genome. Key words: Maize (Zea mays L.), Agrobacterium tumefaciens, transformation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without antioxidants, LS and MS media gave higher transient GUS expression frequencies than N6 and D media.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) and Murashige and Skoog (MS) mediae1
Outcome
frequencies of transient GUS expressione1
Direction
highere1
Qualifier
In the absence of the antioxidants L-cysteine and dithiothreitol (DTT)e1
Comparator
Chu (N6) and Ducan (D)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“In the absence of the antioxidants L-cysteine and dithiothreitol (DTT), the frequencies of transient GUS expression was higher using Linsmaier and Skoog (LS) and Murashige and Skoog (MS) media as an alternative to Chu (N6) and Ducan (D)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 192–428 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With antioxidants, N6 basal medium performed better than MS, LS and D media.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
N6 basal mediume2
Outcome
performancee2
Direction
bettere2
Qualifier
in the presence of antioxidantse2
Comparator
MS, LS and D basal mediae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e2

“N6 basal medium exhibited better performance in the presence of antioxidants than MS, LS and D basal media”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–536 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest transformation efficiency, 15.9%, was obtained at 50% N6 salt concentration.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
50% salt concentratione3
Outcome
transformation efficiencye3
Direction
higheste3
Value
15.9%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e3

“the highest transformation efficiency was 15.9% under a 50% salt concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 622–700 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 70% N6 salt, transformation efficiency was 6.4%, lower than at 50%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
70e4
Outcome
transformation efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
6.4%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by 6.4% transformation efficiency with 70 and 3.2% under 100% salt conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–788 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 100% N6 salt, transformation efficiency was 3.2%, lower than at 50%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
100% salt conditionse4
Outcome
transformation efficiencye4
Direction
lowerinferrede4
Value
3.2%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e4

“followed by 6.4% transformation efficiency with 70 and 3.2% under 100% salt conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 702–788 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More than 95% of infected immature embryos showed GUS staining at 10 and 30% salt.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
immature embryose5
Treatment
10 and 30% salt concentrationse5
Outcome
GUS staininge5
Value
More than 95%e5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e5

“More than 95% of infected immature embryos exhibited GUS staining under 10 and 30% salt concentrations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–892 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No embryo developed into embryogenic callus at 10 or 30% salt.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Organ / stage
embryose6
Outcome
embryogenic calluse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e6

“however none of the embryos developed into embryogenic callus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–955 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low salt levels favored T-DNA delivery into maize tissue.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
low salt levelse7
Outcome
T-DNA deliverye7
Direction
favorede7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e7

“indicating that low salt levels favored T-DNA delivery, but not stable transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low salt levels did not favor stable transformation.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
low salt levelse7
Outcome
stable transformatione7

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e7

“indicating that low salt levels favored T-DNA delivery, but not stable transformation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 957–1042 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DTT or L-cysteine significantly improved the frequency of transient GUS expression.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
DTT or L-cysteinee1
Outcome
frequency of transient GUS expressione1
Direction
improvemente1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“Additions of DTT or L-cysteine, or a combination of L-cysteine and DTT, showed a significant improvement in the frequency of transient GUS expression”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1044–1193 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Copper sulfate did not increase transient GUS expression.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
independent CuSO4treatmentse1
Outcome
increasese1
Direction
not observede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“however increases were not observed with independent CuSO4treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1195–1263 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PCR and Southern blot confirmed T-DNA integration into the maize genome.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Outcome
T-DNA integratione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 140–148 · show in text ↑
e0

“Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern-blot analysis confirmed T-DNA integration into the maize genome”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1265–1373 · show in text ↑

in vitro · molecular: expression · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 5 positive, 3 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.