Paper · 2014 · Agronomy Journal

Understanding Global and Historical Nutrient Use Efficiencies for Closing Maize Yield Gaps

Ignacio A. Ciampitti; Tony J. Vyn

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
113
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Global food security must address the dual challenges of closing yield gaps (i.e., actual vs. potential yield) while improving environmental sustainability. Nutrient balance is essential for achieving global food security. Historical (in distinct “Eras” from late 1800s to 2012) and geographical (in United States vs. remainder of World) changes in maize ( Zea mays L.) grain yields and plant nutrient content (N, P, and K) were characterized from studies (>150) with known plant densities. At the community scale, greater yield to nutrient content ratios (physiological efficiency, PE) were documented for United States vs. World. The U.S. historical trend displayed increasing gains for community‐scale yield and nutrient uptake, except for a recent decline attributed to weather. At the individual‐plant scale, geographic PE differences over time were primarily explained by changes in yield, and secondarily by nutrient content changes. Despite wide variation, high‐yield maize in both geographies was associated with balanced N/P (5:1) and N/K (1:1) ratios. More scope exists for maize nutrient PE gains in developing regions. Achieving balanced nutrition in optimally integrated soil‐crop management cropping systems will facilitate simultaneous realization of high‐yield and bio‐fortification goals in maize improvement efforts.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Community-scale physiological efficiency was greater in the United States than elsewhere.

Outcome
yield to nutrient content ratiose0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
Worlde0
Setting
United Statese0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“greater yield to nutrient content ratios (physiological efficiency, PE) were documented for United States vs. World”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 515–630 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

US community-scale yield and nutrient uptake increased historically, apart from a recent weather-related decline.

Outcome
community‐scale yield and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasing gainse0
Qualifier
except for a recent decline attributed to weathere0
Setting
U.S.e0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The U.S. historical trend displayed increasing gains for community‐scale yield and nutrient uptake, except for a recent decline attributed to weather”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 632–781 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual-plant geographic PE differences were explained primarily by yield changes and secondarily by nutrient content changes.

Outcome
geographic PE differencese0
Qualifier
changes in yield, and secondarily by nutrient content changese0

Not reportedTaxonDirection

Verbatim

e0

“geographic PE differences over time were primarily explained by changes in yield, and secondarily by nutrient content changes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 814–939 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-yield maize was associated with balanced N/P ratio of 5:1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
N/Pe0
Value
5:1e0
Qualifier
high‐yielde0
Setting
both geographiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high‐yield maize in both geographies was associated with balanced N/P (5:1) and N/K (1:1) ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1061 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High-yield maize was associated with balanced N/K ratio of 1:1.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
N/Ke0
Value
1:1e0
Qualifier
high‐yielde0
Setting
both geographiese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high‐yield maize in both geographies was associated with balanced N/P (5:1) and N/K (1:1) ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 965–1061 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Developing regions have more scope for maize nutrient physiological efficiency gains.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
nutrient PE gainse0
Setting
developing regionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“More scope exists for maize nutrient PE gains in developing regions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1063–1130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced nutrition and integrated soil-crop management are recommended for high yield and biofortification.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
balanced nutritione0
Outcome
high‐yield and bio‐fortification goalse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Achieving balanced nutrition in optimally integrated soil‐crop management cropping systems will facilitate simultaneous realization of high‐yield and bio‐fortification goals in maize improvement efforts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1132–1334 · show in text ↑